Hide Forgot
Description of problem: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBTIS-178 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 JBDSIS 7.0.0.Beta2 p2 update site installation screen capture.
Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 Hey Kris - The question is: Will the 6.0.0 JBoss Drools works okay with the SOA 5.x compatibility installation (any server incompatibilities, etc)? Thanks
Created attachment 798380 [details] Screenshot
Kris Verlaenen <kris.verlaenen> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 The idea is that the Drools & jBPM plugins would support older versions too. So, based on the ability to configure your own runtime and backwards compatibility of resource files, that should be possible.
Lukáš Petrovický <lpetrovi> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 Kris, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't 6.0 always used for rule validation inside the editor etc.?
Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 Any more discussion on this one? Given the component tech leads comments and the fact that is assigned back to me - I plan on closing this JIRA tomorrow if there are no further comments.
Paul Leacu <pleacu> updated the status of jira JBTIS-178 to Resolved
Paul Leacu <pleacu> made a comment on jira JBTIS-178 From Kris - there is no issue - the current drools/jBPM has backward compatibility built into them: The idea is that the Drools & jBPM plugins would support older versions too. So, based on the ability to configure your own runtime and backwards compatibility of resource files, that should be possible.
See Comment 8 - no issue (from component tech lead).