RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1008979 - possible memory leaks in libvirt detected
Summary: possible memory leaks in libvirt detected
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libvirt
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Libvirt Maintainers
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-17 12:35 UTC by Tomas Pelka
Modified: 2013-09-17 13:18 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-17 13:18:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
valgrind output (98.55 KB, text/plain)
2013-09-17 12:36 UTC, Tomas Pelka 		no flags Details
View All

Description Tomas Pelka 2013-09-17 12:35:48 UTC 
Description of problem:
see attached vlagrind output

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libvirt-0.10.2-24.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes -v --log-file=libvirt.leaks /usr/sbin/libvirtd
2.
3.

Actual results:
==17326== LEAK SUMMARY:
==17326==    definitely lost: 46 bytes in 2 blocks
==17326==    indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==17326==      possibly lost: 88 bytes in 2 blocks
==17326==    still reachable: 149,774 bytes in 1,610 blocks
==17326==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==17326== 
==17326== ERROR SUMMARY: 4 errors from 4 contexts (suppressed: 8 from 6)

Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Tomas Pelka 2013-09-17 12:36:25 UTC 
Created attachment 798799 [details]
valgrind output
Comment 2 Jiri Denemark 2013-09-17 13:00:22 UTC 
There are only 2 blocks of definitely lost memory:

==17371== 21 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 19 of 127
==17371==    at 0x4A069EE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:270)
==17371==    by 0x5C68744: PR_GetLibraryFilePathname (prlink.c:1346)
==17371==    by 0x5EE28E5: PR_GetLibraryFilePathname_stub (stubs.c:363)
==17371==    by 0x5EBE6A8: BLAPI_FIPSInstalled (shvfy.c:286)
==17371==    by 0x5EA970A: fips_startup_tests (fipstest.c:2175)
==17371==    by 0x5EE7FD5: ??? (in /lib64/libfreebl3.so)
==17371==    by 0x5E969DA: ??? (in /lib64/libfreebl3.so)

and

==17371== 25 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 34 of 127
==17371==    at 0x4A069EE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:270)
==17371==    by 0x5634A16: PORT_Alloc_Util (secport.c:78)
==17371==    by 0x5EBE612: mkCheckFileName (shvfy.c:231)
==17371==    by 0x5EBE6C7: BLAPI_FIPSInstalled (shvfy.c:293)
==17371==    by 0x5EA970A: fips_startup_tests (fipstest.c:2175)
==17371==    by 0x5EE7FD5: ??? (in /lib64/libfreebl3.so)
==17371==    by 0x5E969DA: ??? (in /lib64/libfreebl3.so)
Comment 3 Jiri Denemark 2013-09-17 13:18:20 UTC 
The two possibly lost blocks are similar so there's no detected leak in libvirtd. Also libvirtd is a daemon that tends to initialize some data structures at startup and keep them forever so there's not much sense in reporting reachable memory blocks.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.