Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hslua.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hslua-0.3.6.1-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: The Scripting.Lua module is a wrapper of Lua language interpreter as described in www.lua.org.
This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5949925
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hslua/ghc-hslua.spec SRPM: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-hslua/ghc-hslua-0.3.6.1-2.fc19.src.rpm add static provides
Taking for review.
Approving but there are some minor things to fix at import-time. Also the summary might be read better as "Lua language interpreter embedded in Haskell", I believe "embedding" is an upstream typo. Review follows. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. (BSD vs MIT) [!]: Latest version is packaged. (0.3.10 is out) [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. (Throw in a comment about the patch? :-) ) ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 593920 bytes in 20 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Haskell: [x]: This should never happen ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL). [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: ghc-hslua-0.3.6.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-hslua-devel-0.3.6.1-2.fc20.x86_64.rpm ghc-hslua-0.3.6.1-2.fc20.src.rpm ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lua -> Lu, La, Luna ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lua -> Lu, La, Luna ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lua -> la, luau, lea ghc-hslua.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lua -> Lu, La, Luna ghc-hslua.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lua -> Lu, La, Luna ghc-hslua.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-hslua.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lua -> la, luau, lea 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint ghc-hslua ghc-hslua-devel ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Lua -> Lu, La, Luna ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Lua -> Lu, La, Luna ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow ghc-hslua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lua -> la, luau, lea 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- ghc-hslua (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): ghc(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc(mtl-2.1.2-82086cac9073862cbe01e44b81ec8b9b) libHSbase-4.6.0.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSghc-prim-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSinteger-gmp-0.5.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHSmtl-2.1.2-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libHStransformers-0.3.0.0-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libgmp.so.10()(64bit) liblua-5.2.so()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) ghc-hslua-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh ghc(hslua-0.3.6.1-673b8eb83d38be9dd7a71258da896533) ghc-compiler ghc-devel(base-4.6.0.1-8aa5d403c45ea59dcd2c39f123e27d57) ghc-devel(mtl-2.1.2-82086cac9073862cbe01e44b81ec8b9b) ghc-hslua(x86-64) pkgconfig(lua) Provides -------- ghc-hslua: ghc(hslua-0.3.6.1-673b8eb83d38be9dd7a71258da896533) ghc-hslua ghc-hslua(x86-64) libHShslua-0.3.6.1-ghc7.6.3.so()(64bit) ghc-hslua-devel: ghc-devel(hslua-0.3.6.1-673b8eb83d38be9dd7a71258da896533) ghc-hslua-devel ghc-hslua-devel(x86-64) ghc-hslua-static Unversioned so-files -------------------- ghc-hslua: /usr/lib64/ghc-7.6.3/hslua-0.3.6.1/libHShslua-0.3.6.1-ghc7.6.3.so Source checksums ---------------- http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/hslua/0.3.6.1/hslua-0.3.6.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 37905c58a1f31bb6870a09b4be577c71f3060f65319120bee8d3dc0a9c7dc030 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 37905c58a1f31bb6870a09b4be577c71f3060f65319120bee8d3dc0a9c7dc030 Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1009375 Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Haskell, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG
Thanks for the careful review. > Also the summary might be read better as "Lua language interpreter embedded > in Haskell", I believe "embedding" is an upstream typo. Okay > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > (BSD vs MIT) Oops I filed https://github.com/osa1/hslua/issues/14 in connection with is. > [!]: Latest version is packaged. > (0.3.10 is out) Ah yes thanks, I should have checked this earlier. > [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. > (Throw in a comment about the patch? :-) ) My patch is upstream now so it can be dropped with the version update. :) Sure, let me fix these when I import - good catches. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-hslua Short Description: Lua language embedded in Haskell Owners: petersen Branches: f20 f19 el6 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc19
ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc20
Package ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1291/ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-1380/ghc-hslua-0.3.10-2.fc20 is the updated f20 package
ghc-hslua-0.3.10-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
ghc-hslua-0.3.10-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.