Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1011234

Summary: subscription-manager list --avail should catch nil service-levels and report the absense of a service-level rather than "None"
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: John Sefler <jsefler>
Component: subscription-managerAssignee: Carter Kozak <ckozak>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: John Sefler <jsefler>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.5CC: awood, bkearney, ckozak, jesusr
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Cause: Consequence: When there is no service level, the user sees the word, None. Fix: Display an empty string when there is no service level. Result:
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 21:30:03 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 862910    

Description John Sefler 2013-09-23 20:38:34 UTC 
Description of problem:
Looks like a python null value is being reported as "None" in the Service Level field reported by subscription-manager list --available.  Because "None" can also be regarded as a valid service level, subscription-manager should report an empty string for subscription pools whose Service Level has not been set.  This is a regression.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager
subscription-manager-1.9.6-1.git.3.5220cd8.el6.x86_64


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
Using the candlepin TESTDATA...

[root@jsefler-6 ~]# subscription-manager list --avail | grep awesomeos-all-no-86_64-cont -B1 -A9
Subscription Name: Awesome OS for All Arch (excpt for x86_64 content)
SKU:               awesomeos-all-no-86_64-cont
Pool ID:           8a9086d3414bd57701414bd724570609
Available:         8
Suggested:         2
Service Level:     None           <============== WRONG (SHOULD BE BLANK)
Service Type:      
Multi-Entitlement: Yes
Ends:              09/22/2014
System Type:       Physical

[root@jsefler-6 ~]# subscription-manager attach --pool 8a9086d3414bd57701414bd724570609
Successfully attached a subscription for: Awesome OS for All Arch (excpt for x86_64 content)
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# subscription-manager list --consumed
+-------------------------------------------+
   Consumed Subscriptions
+-------------------------------------------+
Subscription Name: Awesome OS for All Arch (excpt for x86_64 content)
Provides:          Awesome OS for All Arch (excpt for x86_64 content) Bits
SKU:               awesomeos-all-no-86_64-cont
Contract:          85
Account:           12331131231
Serial:            8472276835796622586
Pool ID:           8a9086d3414bd57701414bd724570609
Active:            True
Quantity Used:     2
Service Level:                     <============== CORRECT
Service Type:      
Status Details:    
Starts:            09/22/2013
Ends:              09/22/2014

[root@jsefler-6 ~]#
Comment 1 Carter Kozak 2013-09-23 20:49:45 UTC 
commit 93708d265dda982dd583adacfdbebfb1ffc2b869
Author: ckozak <ckozak>
Date:   Mon Sep 23 16:44:42 2013 -0400

    1011234: no service level displays empty string
Comment 4 John Sefler 2013-10-03 21:48:14 UTC 
Verifying Version using a candlepin server loaded with TESTDATA...

[root@jsefler-6 ~]# subscription-manager version
server type: Red Hat Subscription Management
subscription management server: 0.8.28-1
subscription-manager: 1.9.8-1.el6
python-rhsm: 1.9.6-1.el6

[root@jsefler-6 ~]# subscription-manager list --avail | grep awesomeos-all-no-86_64-cont -B1 -A9
Provides:          Awesome OS for All Arch (excpt for x86_64 content) Bits
SKU:               awesomeos-all-no-86_64-cont
Pool ID:           8a9087404175311a01417531e93b0f20
Available:         5
Suggested:         2
Service Level:                       <============== VERIFIED
Service Type:      
Multi-Entitlement: Yes
Ends:              09/30/2014
System Type:       Physical

[root@jsefler-6 ~]# subscription-manager list --avail | grep Service
Service Level:     Premium
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     Super
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     Premium
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     Super
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     Super
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     Premium
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     Premium
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     Premium
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     Layered
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
Service Level:     Standard
Service Type:      L1-L3
Service Level:     None
Service Type:      Self-Support
Service Level:     Standard
Service Type:      L1-L3
Service Level:     Standard
Service Type:      L1-L3
Service Level:     None
Service Type:      Self-Support
Service Level:     None
Service Type:      Self-Support
Service Level:     None
Service Type:      Self-Support
Service Level:     Premium
Service Type:      Level 3
Service Level:     Standard
Service Type:      L1-L3
Service Level:     None
Service Type:      Self-Support
Service Level:     
Service Type:      
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# 

VERIFIED: Notice in the grep above that subscriptions with a null/nil/None Service Level are being reported with a blank value while subscriptions with a "None" value are actually being reported as "None".

This regression bug has been fixed.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 21:30:03 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1659.html