Bug 1011992 - High Touch Beta channel mappings should be excluded from channel-cert-mapping.txt
Summary: High Touch Beta channel mappings should be excluded from channel-cert-mapping...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: subscription-manager-migration-data
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Alex Wood
QA Contact: John Sefler
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: rhsm-rhel65
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-09-25 13:51 UTC by John Sefler
Modified: 2013-11-21 21:30 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No description necessary.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-21 21:30:30 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:1659 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE subscription-manager and python-rhsm bug fix and enhancement update 2013-11-20 21:53:10 UTC

Description John Sefler 2013-09-25 13:51:22 UTC
Description of problem:
Quoting dgregor from an old IRC chat based on business logic:
<degregor 5/4/2012> We intentionally exclude HTB channels from the migration script.  It's not a supported use case.

Believing that this statement is still true, the new tooling used to generate the subscription-manager-migration-data package using the product-certs.json file as input needs to explicitly skip over the high touch beta channels.   I believe high touch beta channels are identified as matching regular expression "-htb(-|$)". 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data
subscription-manager-migration-data-1.12.3.2-1.el6.noarch


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# grep -- -htb /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-6/channel-cert-mapping.txt
rhel-x86_64-server-6-htb: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-6-htb-debuginfo: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-ha-6-htb: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-ha-6-htb-debuginfo: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-lb-6-htb: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-lb-6-htb-debuginfo: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-rs-6-htb: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-rs-6-htb-debuginfo: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-sfs-6-htb: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-server-sfs-6-htb-debuginfo: Server-Server-x86_64-820630ab8815-135.pem
rhel-x86_64-workstation-6-htb: Workstation-Workstation-x86_64-82a3dd9c9805-155.pem
rhel-x86_64-workstation-6-htb-debuginfo: Workstation-Workstation-x86_64-82a3dd9c9805-155.pem
rhel-x86_64-workstation-sfs-6-htb: Workstation-Workstation-x86_64-82a3dd9c9805-155.pem
rhel-x86_64-workstation-sfs-6-htb-debuginfo: Workstation-Workstation-x86_64-82a3dd9c9805-155.pem
[root@jsefler-6 ~]#


Actual results:
above

Expected results:
the grep should not have found any -htb channels

Additional info:

Comment 2 Alex Wood 2013-09-25 16:43:14 UTC
commit 68a4692661e116ac9d6ff17917dab9d4b33ba6ed
Author: Alex Wood <awood>
Date:   Wed Sep 25 12:07:52 2013 -0400

    1011992: Skip high touch beta channels.

Comment 5 John Sefler 2013-09-27 15:58:21 UTC
Verifying Version....
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# rpm -q subscription-manager-migration-data
subscription-manager-migration-data-2.0.4-1.el6.noarch

[root@jsefler-6 ~]# grep -- -htb /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-6/channel-cert-mapping.txt
[root@jsefler-6 ~]# 

VERIFIED: There are no longer any High Touch Beta "-htb" channel mappings in /usr/share/rhsm/product/RHEL-6/channel-cert-mapping.txt.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2013-11-21 21:30:30 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1659.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.