Bug 101223
| Summary: | Can we have g++32 rpms to match gcc32 rpms | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux Beta | Reporter: | Need Real Name <mike> |
| Component: | gcc32 | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | beta1 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2003-07-30 15:10:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Need Real Name
2003-07-30 09:06:52 UTC
No, I don't want to support too many compilers in the distro. libstdc++.so from GCC 3.3 should be backwards compatible with the one from GCC 3.2.x, likewise libgcc. If there is stuff which fails to build with gcc 3.3, then the question is what the problem is and if that stuff shouldn't be fixed (assuming it is not G++ 3.3 bug, in which case it should be reported and fixed in G++). |