Bug 1016076 - Remove notice about no JMS bridges in EAP 6
Summary: Remove notice about no JMS bridges in EAP 6
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: GA
: EAP 6.2.0
Assignee: sgilda
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-07 12:53 UTC by Martin Svehla
Modified: 2014-08-14 15:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 14877, Migration Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 02-10-2013 13:32:44 Topic ID: 9374-460345 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2013-12-15 16:18:01 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Martin Svehla 2013-10-07 12:53:56 UTC
Title: Configure a JMS Bridge to Migrate Existing JMS Messages to JBoss EAP 6

Describe the issue:
Remove text "Although JBoss EAP 6 does not currently have a JMS bridge available, you can deploy a JMS bridge to JBoss EAP 5.x to move the messages to JBoss EAP 6."

JMS bridges are available in latest EAP 6 releases

Comment 1 sgilda 2013-10-08 13:04:35 UTC
Martin, where would they find information about how to use the JMS bridges?

Comment 2 Martin Svehla 2013-10-08 13:15:43 UTC
Sande, this bug is more about removing the notice about not having JMS bridges in EAP 6.

However good information is for example here: https://access.redhat.com/site/solutions/480193

Additional explanation of individual bridge settings can be also found in upstream documentation: http://docs.jboss.org/hornetq/2.3.0.Final/docs/user-manual/html/jms-bridge.html (although configuration doesn't translate to EAP 1-to-1, so it would be better to consult with developers).

Comment 3 sgilda 2013-10-21 19:46:27 UTC
Thanks Martin.

Modified topic 9347, Configure a JMS Bridge to Migrate Existing JMS Messages to JBoss EAP 6

Comment 5 Martin Svehla 2013-10-25 07:05:34 UTC
Looks good. Thank you


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.