Since a recent Java update, our IBM expense tool no longer works correctly. Where previously the UI had a drop-down box with categories of expense for entering data, now the dropdown is empty. And I see the following: Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-1" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: null source at java.util.EventObject.<init>(EventObject.java:56) at java.awt.AWTEvent.<init>(AWTEvent.java:337) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:224) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:188) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:150) at sun.awt.X11.XBaseMenuWindow.dispose(XBaseMenuWindow.java:907) at java.awt.MenuComponent.removeNotify(MenuComponent.java:310) at java.awt.Menu.removeNotify(Menu.java:198) at exc.gx.GPopMenu.removeAll(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccExpense.a(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccSpread.onStart(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GXPanelCanvas.addNotify(Unknown Source) at java.awt.Container.addImpl(Container.java:1114) at java.awt.Container.add(Container.java:460) at exc.gx.GPanel.showPanel(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TeaStart.onChange(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GTabs.handleMouseEvent(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.a(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel$MyMouseListener.mouseReleased(Unknown Source) at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:6505) at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:6270) at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2229) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4861) at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2287) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4687) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:735) at java.awt.EventQueue.access$200(EventQueue.java:103) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:694) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:692) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:87) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:708) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:706) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:705) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:242) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:161) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:150) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:146) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:91) Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-1" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: null source at java.util.EventObject.<init>(EventObject.java:56) at java.awt.AWTEvent.<init>(AWTEvent.java:337) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:224) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:188) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:150) at sun.awt.X11.XBaseMenuWindow.dispose(XBaseMenuWindow.java:907) at java.awt.MenuComponent.removeNotify(MenuComponent.java:310) at java.awt.Menu.removeNotify(Menu.java:198) at exc.gx.GPopMenu.removeAll(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccExpense.a(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccExpense.b(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccExpense.s(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccExpense.y(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccExpense.onOpen(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.n(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.o(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.showPanel(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccSpread.c(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccSpread.i(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TccSpread.onOpen(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.n(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.o(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.showPanel(Unknown Source) at exc.tea.TeaStart.onChange(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GTabs.handleMouseEvent(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.a(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel$MyMouseListener.mouseReleased(Unknown Source) at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:6505) at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:6270) at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2229) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4861) at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2287) at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4687) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:735) at java.awt.EventQueue.access$200(EventQueue.java:103) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:694) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:692) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:87) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:708) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:706) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:705) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:242) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:161) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:150) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:146) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:91) . Exception during disposal: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at java.awt.EventQueue.invokeAndWait(EventQueue.java:1272) at java.awt.Window.doDispose(Window.java:1209) at java.awt.Window.dispose(Window.java:1147) at exc.gx.GXFrame.dispose(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.close(Unknown Source) at exc.gx.GPanel.close(Unknown Source) at exc.fe.FeLaunch.stop(Unknown Source) at sun.applet.AppletPanel.run(AppletPanel.java:537) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:724) Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: null source at java.util.EventObject.<init>(EventObject.java:56) at java.awt.AWTEvent.<init>(AWTEvent.java:337) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:224) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:188) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.<init>(InvocationEvent.java:150) at sun.awt.X11.XBaseMenuWindow.dispose(XBaseMenuWindow.java:907) at java.awt.MenuComponent.removeNotify(MenuComponent.java:310) at java.awt.Menu.removeNotify(Menu.java:198) at java.awt.Component.removeNotify(Component.java:6980) at java.awt.Container.removeNotify(Container.java:2816) at java.awt.Container.removeNotify(Container.java:2800) at java.awt.Container.removeNotify(Container.java:2800) at java.awt.Window.removeNotify(Window.java:782) at java.awt.Frame.removeNotify(Frame.java:1041) at java.awt.Window$1DisposeAction.run(Window.java:1190) at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:241) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:733) at java.awt.EventQueue.access$200(EventQueue.java:103) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:694) at java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:692) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:87) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:708) at java.awt.EventQueue$4.run(EventQueue.java:706) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.security.ProtectionDomain$1.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:76) at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:705) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:242) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:161) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:150) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:146) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:138) at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:91) This worked with the initial Fedora 19 1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.fc19 package, and fails with 1.7.0.60-2.4.2.7.fc19. Admittedly, it's quite feasible that this is a buggy application rather than a bug in OpenJDK but should we really be breaking compatibility in a stable release of Fedora? And if it *did* deserve to break, a coherent explanation of why it deserved it would be useful to take back to file a ticket internally; asking *them* for any level of technical clue is going to be painful.
Works with java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.31-2.4.1.4.fc19 Fails with java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.0.fc19
Do you have a reproducer for this?
It has an offline mode, and there's a version in my home directory which I can run. It's somewhat personalised, and I'm reluctant to just post it here because I'm not really sure what's in it. But I don't think the world would end if I shared it with you in private. You (will) have mail...
I didn't realise from the above that this is an applet. I thought it strange that such a regression could result from the minor 2.4.1->2.4.2 update. As it's an applet, it's possible that this is actually due to a change in IcedTea-Web. Do you know if that package has also been updated? If so, someone working on IcedTea-Web is probably better placed to look at this as I don't know what changes they've made recently.
All testing has been done with icedtea-web-1.4.125-0.fc19. The only thing I was changing was the version of the java-1.7.0-openjdk package. WORKS: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.fc19.x86_64.rpm WORKS: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.31-2.4.1.4.fc19.x86_64.rpm FAILS: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.7.fc19.x86_64.rpm There *has* been an update to that package since the initial release of Fedora 19, but that does not appear to be relevant to this failure. If you like, I could try downgrading to the icedtea-1.4-1 version that was originally shipped with Fedora, and see if the update to java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60 magically then *doesn't* introduce this regression. But I'm not sure that's really likely...
With icedtea-web-1.4-2.fc19 the results are exactly the same as before: WORKS: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.fc19.x86_64.rpm WORKS: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.31-2.4.1.4.fc19.x86_64.rpm FAILS: java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.7.fc19.x86_64.rpm
(In reply to David Woodhouse from comment #5) > All testing has been done with icedtea-web-1.4.125-0.fc19 Apologies, that should obviously be icedtea-web-1.4.1-0.fc19. Either way, it doesn't seem that icedtea-web is implicated here. Even if I rebuild it against the newer java-1.7.0-openjdk package, the results are the same.
May you confirm, that the java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.2.7.fc19.x86_64.rpm is not working even with icedtea-web-1.3.2 and 1.4.0 ?
I confirmed that for 1.4.0 in comment 6. Where can I find 1.3.2 for testing? I tried reverting the F19 package repo to commit 8be6cfa7 but couldn't easily make it build. And the build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=412448 appears to have broken 'download' links.
Clearing needinfo again. After IRC conversation I think it was conceded that we didn't really need to test with iceatea-web 1.3.2 to conclude that this was a regression in java-1.7.0-openjdk. I've tried building from source so that I can bisect the failure introduced between 2.4.1 and 2.4.2, but haven't really got very far. So far it just fails at --2013-10-09 23:00:01-- http://icedtea.wildebeest.org/hg/icedtea7-forest/archive/51c1d39f82ae.tar.gz Resolving icedtea.wildebeest.org (icedtea.wildebeest.org)... 212.238.236.112 Connecting to icedtea.wildebeest.org (icedtea.wildebeest.org)|212.238.236.112|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 502 Proxy Error 2013-10-09 23:02:01 ERROR 502: Proxy Error. openjdk.tar.gz: FAILED /usr/bin/sha256sum: WARNING: 1 computed checksum did NOT match ERROR: Bad download of OpenJDK root zip ... and even if that works, the *interesting* source code part is being built from tarball snapshots and it's *that* which needs to be bisected, so it would take a lot more knowledge about this build process than I currently have. I've now provided the "offending" app to ahughes and jvanek in private mail though.
Ok, I'll have a look as soon as I can but we're dealing with a huge security errata right now due to go out on the 15th. It may be worth testing with that new version when it appears, just in case it was magically fixed :)
Assigning to Jiri to keep track of the issue
Still fails with java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.60-2.4.3.0.fc19.x86_64 update.
Still broken in Fedora 20 :(
And also in the 1.7.0.60-2.4.4.1.f20 update.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '20'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.