Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1017362
[FEAT] Include per sub-directory export access control for FUSE
Last modified: 2017-08-14 15:45:34 EDT
Description of problem:
There is all-or-nothing Volume access currently with the Volume options. It would be useful to have functionality for the following:
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Try to setup ip range access control for volume subdirectories
No way to do so
I was notified that this request above may not be clear. This is for the native client only, not for NFS.
After discussion with PM, this can be marked as CLOSED WONTFIX as the use case that generated this request has been lessened in urgency.
Whoops - I meant to close 1029198. Re-opening this one for evaluation.
Any action on this RFE? Last update was 18 months ago. Customer still interested in it.
This BZ is still set to NEW, is HIGH SEV, and has been open for over 2 years.
Can we at least guess when and if it will be added to our road-map?
Can I get an update on this BZ for my customer?
@pranith : Can I get an update on the status of this BZ? I see it was tentatively scheduled for upstream 3.8. Do we know if it made it and will be included in RHGS 3.2?
I'd like to get an update on the current status of this BZ and also our future plans for it. Given that there is no significant progress on this BZ for last 3.5 years, customer is concerned and has raised management escalation.
Below I am pasting a snippet from customer's update where they have mentioned about justification/impact on business:
I think we have a strong business use case. Providing persistent storage for OpenShift platform in production scale - high number of projects/apps. This is currently possible only with scaling with number of nodes, but this is not acceptable due to price.
The BZ is still in "NEW" state. Let me know if this BZ needs any data/information from customer to proceed further?
Escalation Manager, CEE
@pranith: Dave Carmichael is trying to set up a call to discuss expectations with IT. Do you have someone that you want to be in the call?
*** Bug 1286783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
@Vijay, Please review previous comment by Neeraj and let us know if any alternative approach (other than the sub-directory export) may help here?
Do we have some update for this bug?