RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1017366 - rpm verify of tuned package fails
Summary: rpm verify of tuned package fails
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: tuned
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jaroslav Škarvada
QA Contact: Tereza Cerna
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-09 17:43 UTC by Hubert Kario
Modified: 2015-07-22 07:14 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tuned-0.2.19-15.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, certain files from the tuned packages could be incorrectly considered to differ from the RPM database. As a consequence, RPM verification performed by running the "rpm -V tuned" command could fail and it could be indicated that the files were changed despite not being touched by the user. This update excludes several attributes, such as size, md5sum, and mtime, from the verification of the files, and RPM verification no longer fails.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-07-22 07:14:51 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2015:1376 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE tuned bug fix update 2015-07-20 17:58:39 UTC

Description Hubert Kario 2013-10-09 17:43:17 UTC 
Description of problem:
When verifying the package using rpm -V the verification fails

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tuned-0.2.19-11.el6.1.noarch
tuned-0.2.19-13.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -V tuned

Actual results:

for -11:
....L....  c /etc/ktune.d/tunedadm.conf
....L....  c /etc/sysconfig/ktune
S.5....T.  c /etc/tune-profiles/active-profile
....L....  c /etc/tuned.conf

for -13:
....L.... c /etc/sysconfig/ktune
S.5....T. c /etc/tune-profiles/active-profile
....L.... c /etc/tuned.conf

Expected results:
no errors

Additional info:
Comment 2 Jaroslav Škarvada 2013-10-10 08:25:30 UTC 
(In reply to Hubert Kario from comment #0)
> for -11:
> ....L....  c /etc/ktune.d/tunedadm.conf
> ....L....  c /etc/sysconfig/ktune
> S.5....T.  c /etc/tune-profiles/active-profile
> ....L....  c /etc/tuned.conf
> 
> for -13:
> ....L.... c /etc/sysconfig/ktune
> S.5....T. c /etc/tune-profiles/active-profile
> ....L.... c /etc/tuned.conf
> 
I think there is no regression. It is caused by (non-optimal) design of the RHEL-6 tuned - it updates symlinks during profile change. So probably both versions behaves the same if same profile is selected. We can disable the check for the affected files.
Comment 3 Hubert Kario 2013-10-10 09:00:36 UTC 
(In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #2)
> I think there is no regression. It is caused by (non-optimal) design of the
> RHEL-6 tuned - it updates symlinks during profile change. So probably both
> versions behaves the same if same profile is selected. We can disable the
> check for the affected files.

Yes, since the file are supposed to be changed, excluding them from the check would be good idea.
Comment 5 Jaroslav Škarvada 2013-10-10 15:05:31 UTC 
Upstream commit:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/tuned.git/commit/?h=1.0&id=815933dd3f711dfef45967a1a79087d68f0559b0
Comment 11 Tereza Cerna 2015-03-04 11:07:57 UTC 
==============================
Verified in version:
    tuned-0.2.19-15.el6.noarch
PASSED
==============================

# rpm -V tuned
# echo $?
0

==================================
Reproduced in version:
    tuned-0.2.19-13.el6_6.1.noarch
FAIL
==================================

# rpm -V tuned
....L....  c /etc/ktune.d/tunedadm.conf
....L....  c /etc/sysconfig/ktune
S.5....T.  c /etc/tune-profiles/active-profile
....L....  c /etc/tuned.conf
# echo $?
1
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2015-07-22 07:14:51 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1376.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.