Bug 1018544 - Review Request: libcuefile - A stripped down version of cuetools
Summary: Review Request: libcuefile - A stripped down version of cuetools
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1018546
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-13 05:11 UTC by Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)
Modified: 2014-07-17 15:21 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-17 15:21:30 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1018449 None None None Never

Internal Links: 1018449

Description Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-10-13 05:11:04 UTC
Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libcuefile/libcuefile.spec
SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libcuefile/libcuefile-0-0.1.svn475.fc21.src.rpm

Description: 
%{name} is a stripped down version of the original cuetools library. This is
used by the musepack tools.

Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha

rpmlint errors:
[asinha@ankur-laptop  SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm
libcuefile.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US musepack -> muse pack, muse-pack, mudpack
libcuefile.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cuetools -> cue tools, cue-tools, stools
libcuefile.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US musepack -> muse pack, muse-pack, mudpack
libcuefile.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcuefile.so.0.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
libcuefile.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libcuefile/COPYING
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/toc_parse.h
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/toc_parse.c
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/cue_parse.c
libcuefile-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/libcuefile_r475/src/cue_parse.h
libcuefile-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 8 warnings.

Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2013-10-13 16:12:23 UTC
(In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #0)
> %{name} is a stripped down version of the original cuetools library. This is
> used by the musepack tools.

Why can't musepack use libcue? From what I can gather from a brief glance, libcuefile is mostly API compatible to libcue.

Comment 2 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2013-10-13 23:41:36 UTC
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #1)
> (In reply to Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) from comment #0)
> > %{name} is a stripped down version of the original cuetools library. This is
> > used by the musepack tools.
> 
> Why can't musepack use libcue? From what I can gather from a brief glance,
> libcuefile is mostly API compatible to libcue.

I've mailed upstream asking them to clarify how libcuefile is different from the library that cuetools provides. I'm not sure yet.

Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2014-07-17 15:21:30 UTC
Not required any more. musepack builds against libcue now.

Closing


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.