Bug 1019039 - License tag is incorrent and missing.
License tag is incorrent and missing.
Status: NEW
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: iputils (Show other bugs)
24
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jan Synacek
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-Legal
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-10-15 00:29 EDT by mejiko
Modified: 2016-02-24 08:13 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description mejiko 2013-10-15 00:29:09 EDT
Hello.

iputils included BSD Licensed files.
but This is 4-clause BSD License.

FileList:

iputils-s20121221/ping.c
iputils-s20121221/ping6.c
iputils-s20121221/tftp.h
iputils-s20121221/tftpd.c
iputils-s20121221/tftpsubs.c
iputils-s20121221/traceroute6.c

I suggest that fix license tag.

Thanks.
Comment 1 mejiko 2013-10-15 01:21:34 EDT
Blocking FE-Legal, This is license tag is missing.
Comment 2 mejiko 2014-03-15 06:04:27 EDT
Changed to rawhide. 

Is this bug is resolved ?
How it this bug current status ?

Thanks.
Comment 3 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 10:08:21 EST
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22
Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-02-24 08:13:35 EST
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle.
Changing version to '24'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.