Bug 1019647 - [RFE] glance integration: rename external provider to OpenStack Image to OpenStack Image (glance)
Summary: [RFE] glance integration: rename external provider to OpenStack Image to Open...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal
Version: 3.3.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.4.0
Assignee: Nobody
QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-16 07:59 UTC by Haim
Modified: 2016-02-10 20:24 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-26 10:10:47 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
screen shot of current behav. (142.64 KB, image/png)
2013-10-16 07:59 UTC, Haim 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Haim 2013-10-16 07:59:06 UTC 
Created attachment 812799 [details]
screen shot of current behav.

Description of problem:


in the web-admin, when adding a new external provider, the name suggested is OpenStack Image, while it might be true, all are familiar with its code name, Glance, so I suggest to add OpenStack Image (Glance), same for Network (Quantum).
Comment 1 Itamar Heim 2013-10-17 07:42:15 UTC 
s/Quantum/Neutron/...
Comment 3 Allon Mureinik 2014-01-26 08:42:38 UTC 
In the current 3.4 (ovirt-engine-3.4-beta1), the new provider menu does not have code names - it displays three options - Foreman, OpenStack Image and OpenStack Network.

This should either be done for all of them, or for none.

Sean - your two cents?
Comment 4 Sean Cohen 2014-01-26 10:10:47 UTC 
(In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3)
> In the current 3.4 (ovirt-engine-3.4-beta1), the new provider menu does not
> have code names - it displays three options - Foreman, OpenStack Image and
> OpenStack Network.
> 
> This should either be done for all of them, or for none.
> 
> Sean - your two cents?

Seems to be the last one, code name already changed once "same for Network (Quantum)" is now in fact already Neutron, hence the current generic naming in place is OK and can with covered with relevant code name as it is already in the product documentation.
Closing as won't fix.
Sean
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.