Bug 102006 - fileutils needs O_DIRECT support for OCFS
fileutils needs O_DIRECT support for OCFS
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1
Classification: Red Hat
Component: fileutils (Show other bugs)
2.1
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Tim Waugh
Mike McLean
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2003-08-08 15:56 EDT by Chris Runge
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:06 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-11-03 10:24:41 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
O_DIRECT patch (13.01 KB, patch)
2003-08-08 15:56 EDT, Chris Runge
no flags Details | Diff
dd O_DIRECT patch (12.64 KB, patch)
2003-08-08 15:57 EDT, Chris Runge
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Chris Runge 2003-08-08 15:56:01 EDT
Description of problem:

The latest version of fileutils lacks O_DIRECT support for cp/dd files from OCFS
filesystems. up2dating to this version breaks this capability.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

fileutils-4.1-10.1.i386.rpm

Additional info:

Oracle (S)RPMS with this support at 
http://oss.oracle.com/~wcoekaer/ocfs/redhat/RPMS/fileutils/
Comment 1 Chris Runge 2003-08-08 15:56:43 EDT
Created attachment 93536 [details]
O_DIRECT patch
Comment 2 Chris Runge 2003-08-08 15:57:09 EDT
Created attachment 93537 [details]
dd O_DIRECT patch
Comment 3 Chris Runge 2003-08-08 15:57:52 EDT
attached two patches from Oracle SRPM which I believe add the support

The reporting customer is Verizon Wireless
Comment 6 Tim Waugh 2003-08-18 05:35:20 EDT
Where should this be built?
Comment 7 Tim Waugh 2003-09-05 06:53:32 EDT
*ping*

Should this be done as an RHBA?
Comment 8 Chris Runge 2003-09-05 09:02:05 EDT
The customer would like an official, supported fix for this.
Comment 9 Mark J. Cox (Product Security) 2003-11-03 10:24:41 EST
An errata has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. 
This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen 
this bug report if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-309.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.