Bug 1021299 - Palette ordering and clean-up
Summary: Palette ordering and clean-up
Keywords:
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Fuse Service Works 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: SwitchYard Editor
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Rob Cernich
QA Contact: Matej Melko
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1023582
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-21 03:07 UTC by Catherine Robson
Modified: 2021-10-15 11:51 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker SWITCHYARD-2773 0 Major Open Palette ordering and clean-up 2020-02-04 03:38:57 UTC

Description Catherine Robson 2013-10-21 03:07:22 UTC 
Description of problem:
The palette of switchyard options in JBDS canvas mode is currently a bit hard to look at and comprehend.

Suggestions for improvement:
- Remove 'Select' from palette listing
- Remove 'Marquee' from palette listing
(both of these are default behavior and do not require canvas actions)

- Consider new grouping and ordering of remaining palette objects.  Should those items that are binding related all be grouped together as "generic" bindings and then the specific types of bindings you might do, and implementations being grouped as generic and then the specific ones you can do?  UX needs to have further discussion with development about these items to come to final conclusion on group names and ordering of remaining objects.

Version:
FSW 6.0.0.ER5
Comment 2 Brian Fitzpatrick 2014-06-09 18:21:31 UTC 
Catherine, both the Select and Marquee palette items have been removed for a bit now. Do you have any additional information you can offer on the grouping/ordering of the palette as we move forward? Am curious if you have a proposed grouping you could suggest along with what the perceived benefits would be?
Comment 3 Catherine Robson 2014-10-13 12:24:45 UTC 
Brian, I think this is worth a document to capture the current palette options and grouping and discuss/review potential changes.  I am not an expert on using the tooling, so it will probably make sense to capture some sensical changes and then review them with your team and some SMEs.

Which version of the tooling should I be looking at to do this?  JBDS 8.0.0 w/ FSW tooling enabled?
Comment 4 Brian Fitzpatrick 2014-10-13 13:36:11 UTC 
Sounds great Catherine. Please let us know if you need any help getting started.
Comment 5 Catherine Robson 2015-02-11 15:45:07 UTC 
Suggestions posted here:  https://developer.jboss.org/wiki/SwitchyardPaletteOrderingInJBDS
Comment 6 Len DiMaggio 2015-02-17 17:37:43 UTC 
Nacking this bugzilla - this is an EAP issue and FSW 6.2 will not embed EAP.
Comment 7 Ken Johnson 2015-03-12 18:51:23 UTC 
How does EAP impact this issue?
Comment 8 Brian Fitzpatrick 2015-03-12 19:44:29 UTC 
Agreed - not sure how EAP impacts this.
Comment 9 Len DiMaggio 2015-03-16 15:45:25 UTC 
Nacked in error! This is not an EAP issue.
Comment 10 Len DiMaggio 2015-03-20 14:26:38 UTC 
Nacking - not a blocker for 6.2 - would be nice to have, but Dev does not have time for this in 6.2
Comment 11 tcunning 2015-04-01 15:35:20 UTC 
Talked to Brian - I don't think we have time for this for the 6.2 release.  Would be happy to take this for a subsequent release.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.