Bug 1021386 - shmall defined incorrectly
Summary: shmall defined incorrectly
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Performance_Tuning_Guide
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Laura Bailey
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-21 08:21 UTC by Robert.Colvin
Modified: 2014-09-08 00:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-09-08 00:17:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Robert.Colvin 2013-10-21 08:21:09 UTC
Description of problem:

Performance Tuning Guide (https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html-single/Performance_Tuning_Guide/index.html) states the following about kernel parameter shmall 

Defines the total amount of shared memory in bytes that can be used on the system at one time. The default value for machines with 64-bit architecture is 4294967296; for 32-bit architecture the default value is 268435456. 

The correct unit is pages, as stated in /usr/share/doc/kernel-doc-2.6.32/Documentation/vm/hugetlbpage.txt

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Edition 4.0

How reproducible:
Documentation Fault: 

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 2 Laura Bailey 2013-11-27 00:11:33 UTC
Unfortunately this could not be corrected in time for RHEL 6.5 GA; it will be corrected in RHEL 6.6. Thankyou for pointing out this error!

Comment 3 Laura Bailey 2014-06-12 06:04:08 UTC
Linda, can someone from your group confirm that shmall (and presumably shmmax) values are measured in pages, not bytes?

Cheers,
Laura B

Comment 4 Laura Bailey 2014-06-26 06:46:40 UTC
Removing the 6.6 flag, as this update can be made asynchronously.

Comment 7 Laura Bailey 2014-07-23 02:36:43 UTC
Docs have been corrected; shmall is now noted in pages. shmmax is still noted as measured in bytes, but I believe this is correct.

Linda, can someone from your group confirm please?

Comment 12 Laura Bailey 2014-09-08 00:17:59 UTC
The corrected document went live over the weekend; the updated content is visible here: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Performance_Tuning_Guide/s-memory-captun.html

Thanks again for reporting this, Robert! Any further problems, just let me know.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.