Bug 1022513 - [abrt] evolution-3.10.1-1.fc20: magazine_cache_pop_magazine: Process /usr/bin/evolution was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Summary: [abrt] evolution-3.10.1-1.fc20: magazine_cache_pop_magazine: Process /usr/bin...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: evolution
Version: 20
Hardware: i686
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Milan Crha
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:c9e0809bdecc68177ecfcc44a6b...
: 1022987 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-23 12:55 UTC by Mikhail
Modified: 2015-06-29 12:41 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-06-29 12:41:57 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
File: backtrace (82.58 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: cgroup (159 bytes, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: core_backtrace (43.83 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: dso_list (23.40 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: environ (3.25 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: exploitable (82 bytes, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: limits (1.29 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: maps (73.06 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: open_fds (1.45 KB, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details
File: proc_pid_status (793 bytes, text/plain)
2013-10-23 12:55 UTC, Mikhail
no flags Details

Description Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:00 UTC
Version-Release number of selected component:
evolution-3.10.1-1.fc20

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.1.8
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        evolution
crash_function: magazine_cache_pop_magazine
executable:     /usr/bin/evolution
kernel:         3.11.6-300.fc20.i686+PAE
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #0 magazine_cache_pop_magazine at gslice.c:739
 #1 thread_memory_magazine1_reload at gslice.c:807
 #2 g_slice_alloc at gslice.c:1005
 #3 pango_layout_line_new at pango-layout.c:4777
 #4 process_line at pango-layout.c:3621
 #5 pango_layout_check_lines at pango-layout.c:3979
 #6 pango_layout_get_extents_internal at pango-layout.c:2539
 #7 pango_layout_get_extents at pango-layout.c:2734
 #8 gtk_label_get_preferred_layout_size at gtklabel.c:3584
 #9 gtk_label_get_preferred_size at gtklabel.c:3641

Comment 1 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:04 UTC
Created attachment 815394 [details]
File: backtrace

Comment 2 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:08 UTC
Created attachment 815395 [details]
File: cgroup

Comment 3 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:12 UTC
Created attachment 815396 [details]
File: core_backtrace

Comment 4 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:16 UTC
Created attachment 815397 [details]
File: dso_list

Comment 5 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:19 UTC
Created attachment 815398 [details]
File: environ

Comment 6 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:22 UTC
Created attachment 815399 [details]
File: exploitable

Comment 7 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:27 UTC
Created attachment 815400 [details]
File: limits

Comment 8 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:31 UTC
Created attachment 815402 [details]
File: maps

Comment 9 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:34 UTC
Created attachment 815403 [details]
File: open_fds

Comment 10 Mikhail 2013-10-23 12:55:38 UTC
Created attachment 815404 [details]
File: proc_pid_status

Comment 11 Milan Crha 2013-11-05 17:04:39 UTC
Thanks for a bug report. There seemed to happen some (software) memory corruption, probably caused by a code which wrote to a memory which was not supposed to be written to, like writing to a memory which was released by other part of the code (which can be also caused by a reference counting errors). Such issues can be "found" on any places, it depends what was written in that overwritten part of memory and when it is accessed (the 'found' is like 'application crashes' or some basic memory checking fails). That said, it highly depends what was done before the crash.

By any chance, did you get any similar crashes after certain steps, please?

Comment 12 Milan Crha 2013-11-05 17:05:20 UTC
*** Bug 1022987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 13 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-09-04 14:29:51 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 14 Fedora End Of Life 2015-05-29 09:37:09 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 20. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '20'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 15 Fedora End Of Life 2015-06-29 12:41:57 UTC
Fedora 20 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2015-06-23. Fedora 20 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.