Bug 1023369 - Rebase of gssproxy to latest 0.3.0 release
Summary: Rebase of gssproxy to latest 0.3.0 release
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: gssproxy
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Guenther Deschner
QA Contact: JianHong Yin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 854411
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-25 09:47 UTC by Guenther Deschner
Modified: 2014-06-18 05:23 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7
Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 10:05:40 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Description Guenther Deschner 2013-10-25 09:47:36 UTC 
In order to continue supporting nfs integration with gssproxy for the upcoming rpc.gssd changes, we need to rebase gssproxy to the latest version.
Comment 3 JianHong Yin 2013-11-15 06:00:36 UTC 
# vershow gssproxy-  g/rhel-?7.*201311
=> rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1 -> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1/compose/Server/x86_64/os/Packages}
gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

=> rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1 -> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1/compose/Server/x86_64/os/Packages}
gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
Comment 4 Jan Pazdziora 2014-01-02 08:42:45 UTC 
(In reply to Yin.JianHong from comment #3)
> # vershow gssproxy-  g/rhel-?7.*201311
> => rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1 ->
> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131107.1/compose/Server/
> x86_64/os/Packages}
> gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm
> 
> => rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1 ->
> {http://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RHEL-7.0-20131111.1/compose/Server/
> x86_64/os/Packages}
> gssproxy-0.3.0-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

Hello, what does the Flags: qe_test_coverage? → qe_test_coverage- mean? What sort of automated tests did we run on GSS-Proxy?

It seems the rebase caused regression bug 1047776. Do we have tests for that kind of setup / will we have? Is that regression a reason to revert that rebase?
Comment 8 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 10:05:40 UTC 
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.