Description of problem: The infiniband test fails when it can't find the UDI to log hardware via udev. <output> <output name="Log Hardware Info" description="log hardware info from udev"> Warning: fail to get UDI <summary>FAIL</summary> </output> <output name="Log Status" description="log infiniband status"> Infiniband device 'cxgb3_0' port 1 status: default gid: 0007:4308:adf6:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 base lid: 0x0 sm lid: 0x0 state: 4: ACTIVE phys state: 0: <unknown> rate: 20 Gb/sec (4X DDR) link_layer: Ethernet Infiniband device 'cxgb3_0' port 2 status: default gid: 0007:4308:adf7:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 base lid: 0x0 sm lid: 0x0 state: 1: DOWN phys state: 0: <unknown> rate: 20 Gb/sec (4X DDR) link_layer: Ethernet <summary>PASS</summary> </output> </output> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): hwcert-client 1.6.5-22 Additional info: rdma-dev-08.lab.bos.redhat.com Results file: http://hwcert.boston.devel.redhat.com/hwcert/store/bbrock/PowerEdge/PowerEdge%20R415/x86_64/RHEL/6.5/hwcert-results-rdma-dev-08.lab.bos.redhat.com-20131025041412.xml.gz
Looks like the infiniband device shows up in UDEV as: <device device-bus="" product="cxgb3_0" udi="/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.0/infiniband/cxgb3_0" source="udev" device-class=""> <property name="SUBSYSTEM">infiniband</property> <property name="UDEV_LOG">3</property> <property name="NAME">cxgb3_0</property> <property name="info.udi">/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.0/infiniband/cxgb3_0</property> <property name="DEVPATH">/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:01:00.0/infiniband/cxgb3_0</property> </device> The test is planned based on PCI_CLASS, which doesn't appear. Was this test manually planned?
Do we need to add subsystem infiniband as a plan target?
We could. Is this a supported configuration/RHEL release?
Yes, it was planned manually. By default it wasn't selected. File as a separate bug?
No. via Doug's comments, it seems like it's misconfigured? > This is cxgb3 and it technically is an iWARP system. You might need to > modify your setup to work with it.
(In reply to Greg Nichols from comment #5) > No. via Doug's comments, it seems like it's misconfigured? > > > This is cxgb3 and it technically is an iWARP system. You might need to > > modify your setup to work with it. Closing