RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1024268 - tar --sparse silently corrupts files on filesystems where non-empty files may have zero blocks
Summary: tar --sparse silently corrupts files on filesystems where non-empty files may...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: tar
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Pavel Raiskup
QA Contact: qe-baseos-daemons
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1024095
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-29 09:30 UTC by Pavel Raiskup
Modified: 2015-11-18 14:00 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tar-1.26-27
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1024095
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 12:30:39 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Pavel Raiskup 2013-10-29 09:30:10 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1024095 +++

Description of problem: When I create tar archives with the --sparse flag, some
files are corrupted silently.  I do not see this bug in 1.23, but it is present
in 1.26 and in 1.27.

..snip..

bash-4.2$ tar --sparse -cf - tar.sparse.broken.file | tar -C out --sparse -xpBf -
bash-4.2$ ls -l tar.sparse.broken.file out/tar.sparse.broken.file 
-r--r--r-- 1 ajs    ead 35 Oct 28 15:12 out/tar.sparse.broken.file
-r--r--r-- 1 schorr ead 35 Oct 28 15:12 tar.sparse.broken.file
bash-4.2$ md5sum tar.sparse.broken.file out/tar.sparse.broken.file 
20b4497c7bdc00effbb5ad65d04a3bc3  tar.sparse.broken.file
c54104d7894a1941ca710981da437f9f  out/tar.sparse.broken.file

--- Additional comment from Andrew J. Schorr on 2013-10-28 22:06:31 CET ---

This patch reverts the shortcut added here to decide that a file is empty if
st_blocks is zero:

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/tar.git/commit/?id=a9895fd20c957ce184091672f1623a5bedd82407

On some filesystem such as Netapp, small files are contained in the inode and
have st_blocks set to zero.  So this test is not reliable.

Comment 1 Pavel Raiskup 2013-10-29 09:32:09 UTC
I'm not sure if we support in RHEL7 inlining for any of our file systems, but I
would say that even if we do not, this is worth to fix for RHEL7.

Comment 7 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 12:30:39 UTC
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.

Comment 9 john.haxby@oracle.com 2015-11-18 10:30:31 UTC
ext4, btrfs and ntfs_3g all report non-zero st_blocks for inlined files (see mainline commit 9206c561554c948111d3cf6fc563a0beaaf790b3 for ext4) -- did anyone contact netapp to see if they think they should make a similar fix?

Comment 10 Pavel Raiskup 2015-11-18 14:00:48 UTC
I haven't done so.  Feel free to report.  Tar has been fixed to take this
(possibly wrong?) FS behavior into account.

Btw., GNU tar upstream thread is here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-tar/2013-10/msg00030.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.