Bug 1024823 - rpkg: Use Python 3 instead of Python 2 (and provide both python2-rpkg and python3-rpkg)
Summary: rpkg: Use Python 3 instead of Python 2 (and provide both python2-rpkg and pyt...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rpkg
Version: 28
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: cqi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1024816
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-10-30 13:33 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2018-04-19 16:22 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rpkg-1.53-1.fc27 rpkg-1.53-1.fc26
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-19 00:30:34 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1410403 0 unspecified CLOSED fedpkg-copr: don't depend on fedpkg 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1410403

Description Miro Hrončok 2013-10-30 13:33:37 UTC
Hi, we would like to use Python 3 on the default installation instead of Python 2 on Fedora 22.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default

While this package is not in minimal buildroot, it belongs to fedora-packager stack. We would like to switch to Python 3 there as well.

The goal here is, that for F22 you should use Python 3 instead of Python 2 in this package.

Please, help us update to Python 3 flawlessly.

Check if upstream already support Python 3, if yes, use it and add the support to the package.

If upstream doesn't support Python 3 yet, encourage it to do so by sending patches and offering your help.

When upstream is dead or unwilling to support Python 3, say so and we can solve the problem together.

Chances are, that you ARE the upstream. In that case, everything is easier, just do it yourself.

There is a table on wiki, that should list your package. Chances are, that you can see an upstream link that covers the problem. Anyway, please update the table with information you know.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Churchyard/python3#fedora-packager

I offer my help with this task, so if you have no idea, how to work on this, or it is just not your priority, don't hesitate to ask for help.

(As you've already realized, this is a bulk text, so if something is not quite exact about your package, sorry for that, just ask)

Comment 1 Jaroslav Reznik 2015-03-03 15:10:29 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 22 development cycle.
Changing version to '22'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora22

Comment 2 cqi 2016-06-12 16:47:17 UTC
This is in progress now. Several patches were already merged for compatibility with Python 3. Please refer to upstream https://pagure.io/rpkg/commits/

Comment 3 Fedora End Of Life 2016-07-19 10:32:10 UTC
Fedora 22 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2016-07-19. Fedora 22 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 4 Jan Kurik 2016-07-26 04:12:28 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 25 development cycle.
Changing version to '25'.

Comment 5 Pavel Raiskup 2017-01-11 14:24:19 UTC
Changed $Summary because it would be nice to have pyrpkg library packaged
for all python versions (idea backed up by Python guidelines).

Comment 6 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2017-02-21 16:44:36 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 7 Lubomír Sedlář 2017-02-22 11:45:15 UTC
Renaming the package is tracked separately in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1400592

Comment 8 Pavel Raiskup 2017-02-22 12:06:39 UTC
I don't think package rename is needed, I think 'Provides:' is enough.

Comment 9 Fedora End Of Life 2017-11-16 19:22:30 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 25 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 25. It is Fedora's policy to close all
bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time
this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora  'version'
of '25'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version'
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not
able to fix it before Fedora 25 is end of life. If you would still like
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 10 Fedora End Of Life 2017-12-12 10:24:02 UTC
Fedora 25 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2017-12-12. Fedora 25 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.

Comment 11 Miro Hrončok 2017-12-12 10:34:07 UTC
Still valid

Comment 12 Fedora End Of Life 2018-02-20 15:21:47 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle.
Changing version to '28'.

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2018-04-10 13:48:58 UTC
rpkg-1.53-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dad57d3588

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2018-04-10 13:53:58 UTC
rpkg-1.53-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-60cd44b116

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2018-04-11 22:04:10 UTC
rpkg-1.53-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-60cd44b116

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2018-04-11 22:39:22 UTC
rpkg-1.53-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dad57d3588

Comment 18 Fedora Update System 2018-04-19 00:30:34 UTC
rpkg-1.53-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 19 Fedora Update System 2018-04-19 16:22:56 UTC
rpkg-1.53-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.