Spec URL: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/libsodium.spec SRPM URL: http://um-pe09-2.di.uminho.pt/fedora/libsodium-0.4.5-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Sodium is a portable, cross-compilable, installable, packageable crypto library based on NaCl, with a compatible API Fedora Account System Username: jpo
Additional notes: * this package is a new requirement of ZeroMQ 4 (and CZMQ 2). * target distros: Fedora >= 18 and EPEL6 * additional maintainers are welcome
BTW, the specfile hack --- %if 0%{?rhel} == 6 sed -i 's|_pkg_min_version=0.25|_pkg_min_version=0.23|g' configure %endif ---- will be dropped for the next upstream release [1]. References: [1] - Upstream pull request #93 (status: merged) https://github.com/jedisct1/libsodium/pull/93
Have you seen bug 990423?
No. Missed it when I skimmed over the pending list of review request tickets. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 990423 ***
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #3) > Have you seen bug 990423? Unfortunately, your ticket doesn't appear in http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html because you have too many package submitted, and there appear are only the oldest ones. This was the reason probably that Jose hadn't noticed it.
(In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #1) > Additional notes: > * this package is a new requirement of ZeroMQ 4 (and CZMQ 2). > * target distros: Fedora >= 18 and EPEL6 > * additional maintainers are welcome Are you already working on zeromq4? The tests fail for me in rpmbuild, but all is fine, when running locally...
(In reply to Thomas Spura from comment #6) > (In reply to Jose Pedro Oliveira from comment #1) > > Additional notes: > > * this package is a new requirement of ZeroMQ 4 (and CZMQ 2). > > * target distros: Fedora >= 18 and EPEL6 > > * additional maintainers are welcome > > Are you already working on zeromq4? The tests fail for me in rpmbuild, but > all is fine, when running locally... Thomas, Yes but still needs work. I've just opened a tracking ticket for the update: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045884 jpo