Bug 1032440 - org.picketlink.idm.impl.cache.AbstractInfinispanCacheProvider.getNamespaceForFqn replace inconsistency also in GROUPS_SEARCHES and NODE_ROLE_SEARCHES
Summary: org.picketlink.idm.impl.cache.AbstractInfinispanCacheProvider.getNamespaceFor...
Keywords:
Status: VERIFIED
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Portal Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: PicketLink
Version: 6.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: DR01
: 6.1.1
Assignee: mposolda
QA Contact: Tomas Kyjovsky
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1016420
Blocks: 1018683
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-20 08:33 UTC by Adam Kovari
Modified: 2019-01-01 03:40 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
An issue with PicketlinkIDMCacheService prevented some items being invalidated through JMX. The fix implements changes to PicketlinkIDMCacheService which makes it possible to invalidate all IDM cache items through JMX. The fix also adds the functionality to invalidate items from apiCacheProvider, storeCacheProvider and IntegrationCache. For example, using these arguments to invalidate() operation of JMX should work now: "idm_realm_portal/USERS/demo", "idm_realm_portal/GROUP_SEARCHES/123456".
Clone Of: 1016420
Environment:
Last Closed:
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker GTNPORTAL-3300 0 Major Resolved Add possibility to invalidate items in IntegrationCache via JMX call to PicketlinkIDMCacheService.invalidate() 2014-02-19 16:34:54 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker PLIDM-45 0 Major Resolved It's not possible to invalidate some items in APICacheProvider via JMX call 2014-02-19 16:34:51 UTC
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 516053 0 None None None Never

Comment 5 Tomas Kyjovsky 2014-01-09 18:17:52 UTC 
Verified using PicketLinkIDMCacheService MBean.
Comment 6 Jared MORGAN 2014-02-04 23:36:03 UTC 
I've updated the CCFR text. If you could just verify it is correct, that would be appreciated. I have marked it for inclusion in the release notes.
Comment 7 mposolda 2014-02-05 08:32:58 UTC 
I am confirming that text is correct
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.