Bug 10326 - Kickstart cannot deal with /dev/rd/c0d0 disk
Summary: Kickstart cannot deal with /dev/rd/c0d0 disk
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: installer
Version: 6.2
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brock Organ
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2000-03-24 04:47 UTC by Martin Lichtin
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-06-12 19:20:49 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Martin Lichtin 2000-03-24 04:47:09 UTC 
Kickstart fails to do the partitioning when the first
(or only) drive in the system is /dev/rd/c0d0.
Comment 1 Jay Turner 2000-04-17 19:04:59 UTC 
This issue has been forwarded to a developer for further action.
Comment 2 Brock Organ 2000-05-03 21:53:59 UTC 
Using 6.2 works for me with a Mylex Corporation DAC960PX (rev 03) ... is this
similar to what you were using...?

DAC960: ***** DAC960 RAID Driver Version 2.2.4 of 23 August 1999 *****
DAC960: Copyright 1998-1999 by Leonard N. Zubkoff <lnz>
DAC960#0: Configuring Mylex DAC960PTL1 PCI RAID Controller
DAC960#0:   Firmware Version: 4.06-0-60, Channels: 1, Memory Size: 8MB
DAC960#0:   PCI Bus: 0, Device: 10, Function: 1, I/O Address: Unassigned
DAC960#0:   PCI Address: 0xE7000000 mapped at 0xC4814000, IRQ Channel: 10
DAC960#0:   Controller Queue Depth: 128, Maximum Blocks per Command: 128
DAC960#0:   Driver Queue Depth: 127, Maximum Scatter/Gather Segments: 33
DAC960#0:   Stripe Size: 64KB, Segment Size: 8KB, BIOS Geometry: 255/63
DAC960#0:   Physical Devices:
DAC960#0:     0:2  Vendor: Quantum   Model: XP32150W          Revision: L912
DAC960#0:          Serial Number: PCB=JF54346804  ; HDA=PE5455
DAC960#0:          Disk Status: Online, 4405248 blocks
DAC960#0:   Logical Drives:
DAC960#0:     /dev/rd/c0d0: RAID-7, Online, 4405248 blocks, Write Thru
 rd/c0d0: rd/c0d0p1 rd/c0d0p2 < rd/c0d0p5 rd/c0d0p6 >
Comment 3 Martin Lichtin 2000-06-12 19:20:48 UTC 
Right, this works fine with 6.2, I think the problem was with
6.1 or a 6.2beta version.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.