Bug 1033300 - Review Request: tmuxinator - Create and manage complex tmux sessions easily
Summary: Review Request: tmuxinator - Create and manage complex tmux sessions easily
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael S.
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-21 20:23 UTC by Adam Miller
Modified: 2014-07-22 03:29 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tmuxinator-0.6.8-1.fc20
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-22 03:29:50 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
misc: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Adam Miller 2013-11-21 20:23:07 UTC
Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/tmuxinator.spec
SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/tmuxinator-0.6.6-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Create and manage complex tmux sessions easily
Fedora Account System Username: maxamillion

Comment 1 Christopher Meng 2013-11-22 04:34:38 UTC
[OT]

Please push updates of ophcrack.

Comment 2 Michael S. 2013-12-15 17:40:21 UTC
Package is mostly ok, any reason to not have a %check for it ?

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

- %check is not here, while there is a test suite, any reason to disable it ?


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /tmp/1033300-tmuxinator/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
     /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is
     arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: tmuxinator-0.6.6-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
          tmuxinator-doc-0.6.6-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
          tmuxinator-0.6.6-1.fc20.src.rpm
tmuxinator.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/gems/gems/tmuxinator-0.6.6/lib/tmuxinator/assets/template.erb <%=
tmuxinator.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/gems/gems/tmuxinator-0.6.6/lib/tmuxinator/assets/template.erb 0644L <%=
tmuxinator.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tmuxinator
tmuxinator.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mux
tmuxinator.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) tmux -> tux
tmuxinator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tmux -> tux
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint tmuxinator-doc tmuxinator
tmuxinator.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/gems/gems/tmuxinator-0.6.6/lib/tmuxinator/assets/template.erb <%=
tmuxinator.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/gems/gems/tmuxinator-0.6.6/lib/tmuxinator/assets/template.erb 0644L <%=
tmuxinator.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tmuxinator
tmuxinator.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mux
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
tmuxinator-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    tmuxinator

tmuxinator (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/env
    /usr/bin/ruby
    ruby(release)
    ruby(rubygems)
    rubygem(activesupport)
    rubygem(erubis)
    rubygem(thor)
    tmux



Provides
--------
tmuxinator-doc:
    tmuxinator-doc

tmuxinator:
    rubygem(tmuxinator)
    tmuxinator



Source checksums
----------------
https://rubygems.org/gems/tmuxinator-0.6.6.gem :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : e7e60117bc4e7702be718be0e1da97bcc2944897836f2601da22df2f3c85a99a
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : e7e60117bc4e7702be718be0e1da97bcc2944897836f2601da22df2f3c85a99a


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.0 (920221d) last change: 2013-08-30
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1033300
Buildroot used: fedora-20-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, SugarActivity, Perl, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG

Comment 3 Adam Miller 2014-07-08 06:53:37 UTC
Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/tmuxinator.spec
SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/tmuxinator-0.6.8-1.fc20.src.rpm

Very sorry for the lag time on this, things got busy and this completely fell off my radar. I've updated to latest upstream and provided a comment as to why I'm not running the rspec tests in the %check section.

-AdamM

Comment 4 Michael S. 2014-07-10 08:29:27 UTC
Ok, seems good.

Comment 5 Adam Miller 2014-07-10 14:13:27 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: tmuxinator
Short Description: Create and manage complex tmux sessions easily
Upstream URL: https://github.com/aziz/tmuxinator
Owners: maxamillion
Branches: f20 f21 epel7
InitialCC:

Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-07-10 14:38:57 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2014-07-10 17:02:46 UTC
tmuxinator-0.6.8-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tmuxinator-0.6.8-1.fc20

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2014-07-12 02:22:05 UTC
tmuxinator-0.6.8-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-07-22 03:29:50 UTC
tmuxinator-0.6.8-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.