Bug 1033322 - Process for adding RHEL hosts using keys instead of providing root password
Summary: Process for adding RHEL hosts using keys instead of providing root password
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 962162
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RFEs
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Andrew Cathrow
QA Contact: Shai Revivo
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-21 21:00 UTC by Allie DeVolder
Modified: 2018-12-04 16:28 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-11-24 10:43:32 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Allie DeVolder 2013-11-21 21:00:07 UTC
- What is the nature and description of the request?
When adding a new hypervisor to RHEV 3.2 it is required that you supply the root password to setup the hypervisor. This is a security problem and these fields appear to be required. I have attempted to circumvent this by adding the engine's ssh pubkey to ~root/.ssh/authorized_keys on a new hypervisor and supplying a bogus password to the RHEV-M add host operation. This yields an authentication failure error.

- Why does the customer need this? (List the business requirements here)
Security policy prohibits distributing root passwords in this manner

- How would the customer like to achieve this? (List the functional
requirements here)
Ability to manually download public key from manager, then checkbox in Add Host dialogue box saying this was done so root password isn't necessary

- For each functional requirement listed in question 4, specify how Red Hat
and the customer can test to confirm the requirement is successfully
implemented.
Add host using pubkey as described in 4

- Is there already an existing RFE upstream or in Red Hat bugzilla?
No

- How quickly does this need resolved? (desired target release)
3.2.x or 3.3

- List the affected packages
rhevm

Comment 2 Alon Bar-Lev 2013-11-24 10:43:32 UTC
Was not aware of this one.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 962162 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.