Bug 1034013 - xfstests xfs/300: xfs_fsr / swapext management test failed
Summary: xfstests xfs/300: xfs_fsr / swapext management test failed
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: xfsprogs
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Eric Sandeen
QA Contact: Boris Ranto
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-25 04:29 UTC by Eryu Guan
Modified: 2014-06-18 04:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: xfsprogs-3.2.0-0.3.alpha2.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 11:45:12 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Full test log (5.98 KB, text/plain)
2013-11-25 04:29 UTC, Eryu Guan
no flags Details

Description Eryu Guan 2013-11-25 04:29:39 UTC
Created attachment 828510 [details]
Full test log

Description of problem:
Seems a known issue in upstream, file one bug to track it internally.

=== full diff out/out.bad ===
--- /dev/fd/63	2013-11-15 09:09:05.644743927 -0500
+++ results/xfs/300.out.bad	2013-11-15 09:09:03.489861105 -0500
@@ -1,3 +1 @@
 QA output created by 300
-SCRATCH_MNT/300.test
-extents before:6 after:1 DONE SCRATCH_MNT/300.test

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
xfsprogs-3.2.0-0.1.alpha1.el7

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. check xfs/300 on xfs
2.
3.

Actual results:
test fails

Expected results:
test passes

Additional info:

Comment 1 Eric Sandeen 2013-11-25 16:18:50 UTC
Fixed upstream, will be in 3.2.0-alpha2 soon.

Comment 2 Eric Sandeen 2014-02-21 18:38:56 UTC
Hm, on my box now it's doing:

 QA output created by 300
 SCRATCH_MNT/300.test
-extents before:6 after:1 DONE SCRATCH_MNT/300.test
+extents before:7 after:1 DONE SCRATCH_MNT/300.test

which is a different "problem" - original file created w/ more extents than expected.

Comment 3 Eric Sandeen 2014-02-21 18:42:33 UTC
Ok, it's just a test bug now that the actual underlying bug is fixed.

It's doing:

# Fragment the file by writing backwards
for I in `seq 6 -1 0`; do
        dd if=/dev/zero of=$SCRATCH_MNT/$seq.test seek=$I bs=4k \
           oflag=direct count=1 conv=notrunc >> $seqres.full 2>&1
done

and we're getting:

 EXT: FILE-OFFSET      BLOCK-RANGE      AG AG-OFFSET        TOTAL
   0: [0..7]:          160..167          0 (160..167)           8
   1: [8..15]:         152..159          0 (152..159)           8
   2: [16..23]:        144..151          0 (144..151)           8
   3: [24..31]:        136..143          0 (136..143)           8
   4: [32..39]:        128..135          0 (128..135)           8
   5: [40..47]:        120..127          0 (120..127)           8
   6: [48..55]:        112..119          0 (112..119)           8

As expected.  ;)  The .out file is simply wrong, I'll send a patch upstream.

Comment 6 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 11:45:12 UTC
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.