Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Previously, the "ip -6 addrlabel" command returned an incorrect error message that contained "inet" instead of "inet6". To fix this bug, the error message has been changed to include "inet" for IPv4 addresses and "inet6" for IPv6 addresses.
Description of problem:
ip -6 addrlabel return incorrect error message
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ip -6 addrlabel add prefix 1.1.1.1/24 label 123
2.
3.
Actual results:
Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "1.1.1.1/24".
Expected results:
Error: an inet6 prefix is expected rather than "1.1.1.1/24".
Additional info:
How about correct the address message at the same time
diff --git a/lib/utils.c b/lib/utils.c
index 4e9c719..eb92414 100644
--- a/lib/utils.c
+++ b/lib/utils.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ int get_addr(inet_prefix *dst, const char *arg, int family)
exit(1);
}
if (get_addr_1(dst, arg, family)) {
- fprintf(stderr, "Error: an inet address is expected rather than \"%s\".\n", arg);
+ fprintf(stderr, "Error: an %s address is expected rather than \"%s\".\n", (family == AF_INET6 ? "inet6" : "inet") ,arg);
exit(1);
}
return 0;
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int get_prefix(inet_prefix *dst, char *arg, int family)
exit(1);
}
if (get_prefix_1(dst, arg, family)) {
- fprintf(stderr, "Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than \"%s\".\n", arg);
+ fprintf(stderr, "Error: an %s prefix is expected rather than \"%s\".\n", (family == AF_INET6 ? "inet6" : "inet") ,arg);
exit(1);
}
return 0;
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1331.html