Bug 1036185 - [Doc Bug Fix] Rewrite SPNEGO Module Options table in Reference in Security Guide
Summary: [Doc Bug Fix] Rewrite SPNEGO Module Options table in Reference in Security Guide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: GA
: EAP 6.3.0
Assignee: Lucas Costi
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1035353
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-11-29 15:53 UTC by Ondrej Lukas
Modified: 2014-08-14 22:52 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build Name: 14876, Security Guide-6.2-1 Build Date: 28-11-2013 11:27:34 Topic ID: 4732-549749 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-08-06 14:38:56 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ondrej Lukas 2013-11-29 15:53:31 UTC
Table A.35. SPNEGO Module Options in Reference has all options wrong - these options are not connected with SPNEGO Module Options, right options are removeRealmFromPrincipal, serverSecurityDomain and usernamePasswordDomain.

Comment 3 Josef Cacek 2014-04-23 17:11:52 UTC
Please change also the caption of the table. Use "SPNEGOUsers Module Options" instead of "SPNEGO Module Options"

The table content seems OK in SG and AG CC-edition and SG 6.3.0-edition.
The fixes are not in Administration and Configuration guide for 6.3.0. (Maybe a new push is needed).

Comment 5 sgilda 2014-05-21 19:01:36 UTC
I'm a little confused about this bug. 

I think mofification of Topic 4735 may be a typo as it is not used in any content spec. Should it be topic 4732?

I'm not sure which book(s) this impacts.

For EAP 6.3, I think it can be verified here:

http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.3/html-single/Security_Guide/index.html#Included_Authentication_Modules1

Comment 6 Lucas Costi 2014-05-21 22:52:38 UTC
You are right Sande, that is a typo. The correct topic is 4732.

However, the change I made in comment 4 has been superseded by a change made in BZ#1036160 (comment 9) for  Peter Skopek.

Josef, can you please confirm that the later change from the above bug is more correct, and that the current table name [1] is ok?

[1] http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.3/html-single/Security_Guide/index.html#topic4732_spnegomoduleoptions

Comment 7 Josef Cacek 2014-06-10 08:23:42 UTC
Lucas, the content seems fine. But we should stay consistent in naming. Either we use "SPNEGO" always or "SPNEGOUsers".

If we stick to "SPNEGO", then one occurrence of "SPNEGOUsers" in [1] should be fixed.

[1] http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.3/html-single/Security_Guide/index.html#LdapLoginModule1

Comment 8 Lucas Costi 2014-06-11 00:20:30 UTC
Thanks Josef. I have corrected that occurrence in "Ldap Login Module" [28310, revision 666517].

I have just checked the A&C and Developer guides too, and have confirmed there are no instances of "SPENGOUSers"

Comment 9 Lucas Costi 2014-06-11 06:23:44 UTC
Changes are now ready for review (Revision 6.3.0-25):

The original issue was verified in [1] as now correct by Josef in comment 7.

The last change requested in comment 7 ("SPNEGOUSers" -> "SPNEGO" in the 'Note' admonition), and fixed in comment 8, is here:

http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.3/html-single/Security_Guide/index.html#LdapLoginModule1

[1] http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Enterprise_Application_Platform/6.3/html-single/Security_Guide/index.html#topic4732_spnegomoduleoptions

Comment 10 Josef Cacek 2014-06-11 06:35:35 UTC
Verified on docs-stage.
Revision 6.3.0-25


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.