Bug 103745 – ported RH7.3 binary behaviour different under compat-libstdc++

Bug 103745 - ported RH7.3 binary behaviour different under compat-libstdc++

Summary:	ported RH7.3 binary behaviour different under compat-libstdc++

Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX

Aliases:	None

Product:	Red Hat Linux
Classification:	Retired
Component:	compat-gcc (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	9
Hardware:	i386 Linux

Priority	medium Severity high
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Jakub Jelinek
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2003-09-04 11:36 EDT by Ken Snider
Modified:	2007-04-18 12:57 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-10-07 10:42:25 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Ken Snider 2003-09-04 11:36:12 EDT

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030701

Description of problem:
Executing a piece of custom-compiled code, build on a redhat 7.3 box with
gcc-c++-2.96-113 and libstdc++-2.96-113 does not properly function using
compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.118 on RH9.

Replacing /usr/lib/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so with the one from the redhat
7.3 distribution results in proper operation of the code in question - so the
issue is most definately this library, included in compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.118.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
compat-libstdc++-7.3-2.96.118

How reproducible:
Always

Currently working on creating a minimized testcase to exhibit the bug, but as it
is closed-source code this is a nontrivial task.

Are there *known* incompatibilities between the "real" RH7.3 libstdc++ and the
one included in compat-libstdc++ on RH9?

Comment 1 Jakub Jelinek 2004-10-07 10:42:25 EDT

There were some issues with -2.96.118, see e.g. #97372, but without
a testcase hard to say.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.