Description of problem: The deployment units table currently contains only deployed items, not items that were deployed or will be deployed in the future. Should we rename this table to more accurately state what it contains? As it is today, I expect to see a state of the deployments in the table because the title makes me expect that I see all deployments, not just currently deployed items. Proposal: Call this "Deployed Projects" “Deployed” makes it clearer that only those items that are currently deployed are in this table. Changing “units” to “projects” seems like a clearer term for users to understand (where did units even come from?) - unless we see things deployed in this table that are not projects. If so, we should have more discussions about what ends up in this table. Version: 6.0.0.ER5
Deployed Units seems more coherent to me. The documentation explains what a deployable unit it so we should just point to the docs : http://docs.jboss.org/jbpm/v6.0/userguide/jBPMIntegration.html#d0e12915
Ok, Deployed Units at least lets you know you will only see currently deployed items in the table.
merged in 6.2.x: https://github.com/droolsjbpm/jbpm-console-ng/commit/2bfcd6a58ff95925443a8452e7760f7e9075478f
Deployment Units screen renamed to Deployed Units.
Employee 'msalatin' has left the company.