Bug 103977 - composite keyword ignored for two way associations
Summary: composite keyword ignored for two way associations
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Web Application Framework
Classification: Retired
Component: persistence
Version: 6.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Archit Shah
QA Contact: Jon Orris
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-09-08 18:36 UTC by Archit Shah
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:57 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-14 20:24:58 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Archit Shah 2003-09-08 18:36:48 UTC 
If you specify the composite keyword on one side of a two-way association, but
don't put the component keyword on the other side, the association is not
treated as a composition (e.g., no cascading delete). The metadata also doesn't
indicate the component/compositeness of the roles.
Comment 1 Archit Shah 2003-09-08 18:38:57 UTC 
fixed at 35757 on branch and 35720 on tip.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.