Bug 1040619 - [PATCH] add 'errors only' reporting option for yum-cron
Summary: [PATCH] add 'errors only' reporting option for yum-cron
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: yum
Version: 7.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Valentina Mukhamedzhanova
QA Contact: Karel Srot
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-11 17:31 UTC by jcpunk
Modified: 2014-06-18 05:18 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: yum-3.4.3-112.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 999155
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-13 10:56:28 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description jcpunk 2013-12-11 17:31:14 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #999155 +++

Description of problem: I've got a large number of workstations that all have yum-cron enabled for package installation.  I don't care if they installed the updates successfully - but I do care if they didn't.

I've attached a patch to allow you to only report errors with yum-cron


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 3.4.3-106.fc19


How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run yum-cron on a system where it errors
2. run yum-cron on a system where it succeeds
3. wish you could only get reports from #1 

Actual results:
reporting always occurs

Expected results:
The ability to trim down what it reports to just systems with errors

Additional info:

A patch to add this behavior is attached.

--- Additional comment from Zdeněk Pavlas on 2013-08-26 07:40:05 EDT ---

http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2013-August/010334.html

I've already written something similar, but this gets rid of more messages, and correctly handles the self.output==[] case, so I like it. Do you think that adding an extra option is better than just honoring the loglevel settings?

--- Additional comment from  on 2013-08-26 09:06:01 EDT ---

Using loglevel for this seems great to me!  Just need to make sure that the reduction in reporting is well documented so everyone knows how to get this behavior.

--- Additional comment from  on 2013-10-21 15:50:55 EDT ---

Just checking back in, log_level seems like the right direction for this.  Any hope of getting your patches at : http://lists.baseurl.org/pipermail/yum-devel/2013-August/010334.html merged?

Comment 2 Zdeněk Pavlas 2013-12-13 10:25:09 UTC
I'd like to resolve this in the same way we did in Fedora, by new handling of yum-cron.conf options.  Previously update_messages=NO acted as a master switch, turning off anything but updating the metadata cache.  Backporting these two commits should be enough:

commit 587288e13575b6f3f6c8cdc1a13abe9117444636
Author: Zdenek Pavlas <zpavlas>
Date:   Fri Oct 11 09:28:57 2013 +0200

    yum-cron: support download/install with update_messages==False. BZ 1018068
    
    (download_updates or apply_updates) now implies that yum-cron should
    do the updates processing, too.  The update_messages==False case is
    then used to make yum-cron less chatty.


commit e1db5d6a94dee861d1fa0552277bc03f037c6e3a
Author: Zdenek Pavlas <zpavlas>
Date:   Tue Dec 10 08:47:48 2013 +0100

    yum-cron: stderr/email: no output if no messages

Comment 8 Ludek Smid 2014-06-13 10:56:28 UTC
This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.