Bug 1041304 - FTBFS: self check failures
Summary: FTBFS: self check failures
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: perl-PDL
Version: 20
Hardware: ppc64
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Petr Pisar
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1018592
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-12 14:27 UTC by Karsten Hopp
Modified: 2014-07-02 13:45 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: perl-PDL-2.7.0-3.fc21
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-02 13:45:49 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (1.03 MB, text/plain)
2013-12-12 14:27 UTC, Karsten Hopp
no flags Details
root.log (130.66 KB, text/plain)
2013-12-12 14:28 UTC, Karsten Hopp
no flags Details

Description Karsten Hopp 2013-12-12 14:27:38 UTC
Created attachment 835819 [details]
build.log

Description of problem:
Result: FAIL
RPM build errors:
Failed 3/124 test programs. 0/1745 subtests failed.
make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 255

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-PDL-2.6.0.90-1.fc20

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. ppc-koji build --scratch f20 perl-PDL-2.6.0.90-1.fc20.src.rpm
2.
3.

Actual results:
http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1568457

Expected results:


Additional info:
This might be a perl bug exposed by perl-PDL's testsuite

Comment 1 Karsten Hopp 2013-12-12 14:28:19 UTC
Created attachment 835830 [details]
root.log

Comment 2 Petr Pisar 2013-12-15 19:04:13 UTC
There is bug in the fortran slatec code:

t/foo.t ..................... ok
 ***MESSAGE FROM ROUTINE PCHIM IN LIBRARY SLATEC.
 ***POTENTIALLY RECOVERABLE ERROR, PROG ABORTED, TRACEBACK REQUESTED
 *  NUMBER OF DATA POINTS LESS THAN TWO
 *  ERROR NUMBER = -1
 *   
 ***END OF MESSAGE
 
 ***JOB ABORT DUE TO UNRECOVERED ERROR.
0          ERROR MESSAGE SUMMARY
 LIBRARY    SUBROUTINE MESSAGE START             NERR     LEVEL     COUNT
 SLATEC     PCHIM      NUMBER OF DATA POINT        -1         1         1
slatec called halt at /builddir/build/BUILD/PDL-2.006_90/blib/lib/PDL/Func.pm line 406.
	(in cleanup) INVALID MAGIC NO 886729600 886731200
	(in cleanup) INVALID MAGIC NO 886729600 -1799157872
t/func.t .................... 
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 8/16 subtests 

And then next invalid free in perl while performing slatec library again:
t/slatec.t .................. 
Failed 40/40 subtests 

It's also caused by the slatec code. Latest 2.007 PDL release fixes some bugs in the slatec.

Comment 3 Petr Pisar 2013-12-16 13:34:16 UTC
2.007 is not better.

Comment 4 Petr Pisar 2013-12-16 14:03:35 UTC
No distribution seems delivering PDL >= 2.4.11 for PPC64. One can disable Slatec with WITH_SLATEC=0.

Comment 5 Petr Pisar 2013-12-16 15:55:41 UTC
After disabling Slatec, tests pass. I will disable the Slatec on PPC64 since F20.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2013-12-16 16:38:06 UTC
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc20

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2014-01-03 08:46:02 UTC
perl-PDL-2.7.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Petr Pisar 2014-02-26 12:04:31 UTC
The fix is not sufficient as it will install some files requiring the disabled PDL::Slatec module:

$ grep -Hnr PDL::Slatec
share/doc/perl-PDL-2.7.0/TODO:137:   * PDL::Slatec
share/doc/perl-PDL-2.7.0/TODO:212:   * Convert PDL::Slatec to use C with f2c of source
share/doc/perl-PDL-2.7.0/Release_Notes:1380:       and EU::F77 installed, PDL::Slatec will be built.
share/doc/perl-PDL-2.7.0/Changes:4964:    we now check if PDL::Slatec can actually be used.  My
share/doc/perl-PDL-2.7.0/Changes:4966:    from the PDL::Slatec build time configuration.
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Modules.pod:228:=item L<PDL::Slatec|PDL::Slatec>
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/MatrixOps.pm:46:L<PDL::Slatec|PDL::Slatec> or any of the PDL::GSL family of modules).
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Matrix.pm:32:want to read L<PDL::MatrixOps> or L<PDL::Slatec>.
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Matrix.pm:90:#use PDL::Slatec;
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Matrix.pm:215:eval "use PDL::Slatec";
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Matrix.pm:220:  croak "inv: PDL::Slatec not available" unless $has_slatec;
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:75:Only available if L<PDL::Slatec|PDL::Slatec> is installed.
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:104:L<PDL::Slatec::chic|PDL::Slatec/chic> and use a hash reference
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:124:of L<chic|PDL::Slatec/chic>. 
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:166:    eval "use PDL::Slatec";
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:265:    croak "ERROR: Hermite interpolation is not available without PDL::Slatec.\n"
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:396:        croak "ERROR: Hermite interpolation is not available without PDL::Slatec.\n"
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Func.pm:404:        croak "ERROR: Hermite interpolation is not available without PDL::Slatec.\n"
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Fit/Polynomial.pm:75:# use PDL::Slatec;  # For matinv()
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Fit/Polynomial.pm:136:L<PDL::Slatec/"polyfit">
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Fit/Linfit.pm:118:use PDL::Slatec; # For matinv()
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Fit/LM.pm:29:use PDL::Slatec; # for matrix inversion
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Filter/LinPred.pm:75:use PDL::Slatec;
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/Filter/LinPred.pm:173:use PDL::Slatec;
lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/PDL/FFT.pm:116:L<PDL::FFTW|PDL::FFTW> and L<PDL::Slatec|PDL::Slatec> - 

We need to remove the reverse dependencies either.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2014-02-26 15:40:22 UTC
perl-PDL-2.7.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-PDL-2.7.0-3.fc20

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2014-03-11 04:17:52 UTC
perl-PDL-2.7.0-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.