There is a problem with the libraries on 5.1. Some programs are linked against a specific version of a library, which does not seem to be present. Incidently, is there a way to ask rpm what uninstalled package provides something? Specifically, which uninstalled package provides a given file, or a given functionality? I can get a list of the files, or a list of the functionalities, but to get the name of the rpm, I can only do that if the package is installed. I must be missing some obvious flag to rpm, right? Notice that libnewt.so.0.20 is a functionality provided, but the actual version of the library is libnewt.so.0.25. Worse, to install the new 3.3.3.1 X servers, something (I no longer remember what, maybe Xconfigurator) actually needed libnewt.so.0.30. Except that I could not figure out any way to install both the .30 package and the original package at the same time -- no way to say "these two packages with the same name are not the same package, and both need to be entered into the rpm database". I wound up uninstalling libnewt and reinstalling libnewt to do this. The "obvious" fix -- symbolic link the .30 library to the .20 name -- did not work. Message was: hwdiag: error in loading shared libraries : undefined symbol: newtListboxAddEntry [root@new-server lib]# Incidently, even with the newer (.30) version of the newt package installed, the symlink in /usr/lib/libnewt.so was still to /usr/lib/libnewt.so.0.25. (you have no idea how much I wish I had known about hwdiag before, when I was installing on a older (486) machine, nor how much more frustrated I'd be if I had known about it then and still could not get it to work. But that was a 5.0 install, and I don't know that 5.0 had hwdiag) NB: Installing libnewt from the 5.0 CD did work, so this is no longer a problem. There was one file in conflict (whiptail, I believe) between the two. However, I noticed that a rpm -ql on the 5.0 libnewt did not mention /usr/lib/libnewt.so.0.20, yet that symlink to .21 was installed. So why are we trying to get 5.1 installed when 5.2 is current? A commercial database program -- O2 -- requires 5.1, not 5.2. I wonder if they have hard coded library usage also. Incidently, the only one of these programs that we actually need is sndconfig -- everything else we have working, but I have no idea how to specify the sound system. And, after finally getting it all to work, my sound card -- a pnp, OPL3, SB compatible, is not auto configured. Sheesh, go figure. Ok, after finally getting everything to work, hwdiag does little more than format the output of /proc/pci and probe for mice/modems. Sndconfig will -- guaranteed -- disable my pnp ethernet board during the probe. Now, next question: The system, as of 5.0, can auto-detect and work with PCI cards, such as ethernet tulip's; and 5.1 can auto-detect AGP video cards. There is a pnpdump program that identifies the type of ethernet and type of sound card. Yet there is no auto-config of PNP cards. Why? CD version: MacMillan publishing "The Complete redhat LINUX operating system 5.1" Michael Gersten keybounce [root@new-server RPMS]# rpm -q --whatrequires libnewt.so.0.20 chkconfig-0.9.3-2 kbdconfig-1.6-2 rhs-hwdiag-0.20-2 sndconfig-0.21-2 timeconfig-2.2-2 [root@new-server RPMS]# rpm -qp * --provides | egrep newt TRANS.TBL does not appear to be a RPM package query of TRANS.TBL failed libnewt.so.0.20 [root@new-server RPMS]# rpm -qlp * | egrep newt TRANS.TBL does not appear to be a RPM package query of TRANS.TBL failed /usr/lib/libnewt.so.0.25 /usr/include/newt.h /usr/lib/libnewt.a /usr/lib/libnewt.so /usr/lib/perl5/i386-linux/5.00404/newt.ph [root@new-server RPMS]# chkconfig chkconfig version 0.9.3 - Copyright (C) 1997 Red Hat Software This may be freely redistributed under the terms of the GNU Public License. usage: chkconfig --list [name] chkconfig --add <name> chkconfig --del <name> chkconfig [--level <levels>] <name> <on|off|reset> [root@new-server RPMS]# kbdconfig kbdconfig: error in loading shared libraries libnewt.so.0.20: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root@new-server RPMS]# rhs-hwdiag bash: rhs-hwdiag: command not found [root@new-server RPMS]# hwdiag hwdiag: error in loading shared libraries libnewt.so.0.20: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root@new-server RPMS]# sndconfig sndconfig: error in loading shared libraries libnewt.so.0.20: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [root@new-server RPMS]# timeconfig timeconfig: error in loading shared libraries libnewt.so.0.20: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
These are not software bugs (and MacMillan does their own support) rpmfind is the best way to locate a package that provides something that is not installed. PNP is better supported in later versions of Red Hat.