Bug 1042707 - Increasing Windows VM Name Length using rhevm-config does not work
Summary: Increasing Windows VM Name Length using rhevm-config does not work
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 991787
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine-config
Version: 3.2.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Yair Zaslavsky
QA Contact: Pavel Stehlik
URL:
Whiteboard: virt
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-13 07:06 UTC by Anand Nande
Modified: 2018-12-04 16:41 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-12-16 11:39:25 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 643373 0 None None None Never

Description Anand Nande 2013-12-13 07:06:01 UTC 
Description of problem:

tried setting:

# rhevm-config -s MaxVmNameLengthWindows=36
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root

# rhevm-config -g MaxVmNameLengthWindows
MaxVmNameLengthWindows: 36 version: general

# service ovirt-engine restart
Stopping engine-service: [  OK  ]
Starting engine-service: [  OK  ]

# rhevm-config -g MaxVmNameLengthWindows
MaxVmNameLengthWindows: 36 version: general

Then from the web-admin portal tried to create a Windows-2012-x86_64 VM.
I was not able to set a 34 character name for Win2012 or any Windows VM.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):  
rhevm-3.2.3-0.43.el6ev.noarch
rhevm-webadmin-portal-3.2.3-0.43.el6ev.noarch
Comment 1 Anand Nande 2013-12-13 07:06:58 UTC 
The webadmin still prompts (on the vm-name box) to have a 15 character name.
Comment 2 Itamar Heim 2013-12-13 07:56:56 UTC 
duplicate of bug 991787 ?
Comment 3 Anand Nande 2013-12-16 10:22:27 UTC 
Hi itamar, yes this seems to be a DUP of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991787. Please go ahead for closing this as CLOSED DUP.
Comment 4 Itamar Heim 2013-12-16 11:39:25 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 991787 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.