Bug 1043485 - Please backport ce5a0dd so as to fix key vs current()
Summary: Please backport ce5a0dd so as to fix key vs current()
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libxslt
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Daniel Veillard
QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1044057
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-16 12:47 UTC by Jan Pokorný [poki]
Modified: 2017-12-06 12:24 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-06 12:24:17 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jan Pokorný [poki] 2013-12-16 12:47:11 UTC
Upstream ML thread:

  https://mail.gnome.org/archives/xslt/2013-December/msg00000.html

This would be needed to make extended validation of HA addon/CMAN-based
cluster stack extended validation (more specifically, the recipe
to distill resource-agents metadata to part of Relax NG schema through
XSLT) as proposed in [1] and with the expected target el6.6 to work
properly.

To check the successful bugfix, one can use either the test case
I provided in the message above, or any of the test cases to be
found in connection with the mentioned references.

[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2013-December/msg00125.html

Comment 1 Daniel Veillard 2013-12-16 13:33:44 UTC
Yes backport ought to be tricial,

Daniel

Comment 7 Mike McCune 2016-03-28 23:43:17 UTC
This bug was accidentally moved from POST to MODIFIED via an error in automation, please see mmccune with any questions

Comment 8 Jan Kurik 2017-12-06 12:24:17 UTC
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 is in the Production 3 Phase. During the Production 3 Phase, Critical impact Security Advisories (RHSAs) and selected Urgent Priority Bug Fix Advisories (RHBAs) may be released as they become available.

The official life cycle policy can be reviewed here:

http://redhat.com/rhel/lifecycle

This issue does not meet the inclusion criteria for the Production 3 Phase and will be marked as CLOSED/WONTFIX. If this remains a critical requirement, please contact Red Hat Customer Support to request a re-evaluation of the issue, citing a clear business justification. Note that a strong business justification will be required for re-evaluation. Red Hat Customer Support can be contacted via the Red Hat Customer Portal at the following URL:

https://access.redhat.com/


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.