Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1044159

Summary: [RFE] Support 'Content Synchronization Operation' (SyncRepl) - RFC 4533
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Nathan Kinder <nkinder>
Component: 389-ds-baseAssignee: Rich Megginson <rmeggins>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Viktor Ashirov <vashirov>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 7.0CC: nhosoi, pspacek, vashirov
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-1.el7 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: One of the LDAP standards RFC 4533 'Content Synchronization Operation' (SyncRepl) has been newly supported. For more details, see also RFC: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4533
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 09:31:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1082754, 1109759, 1115294, 1185092, 1249775, 2084180    

Description Nathan Kinder 2013-12-17 21:33:43 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47388

FreeIPA (bind-dyndb-ldap component) does synchronization between LDAP and external DNS database. Persistent search has some drawbacks for this use case:

=== Persistent search deficiencies ===
1. Persistent search doesn't offer 'signal'/'indication' that all existing records were sent to client already and now the client waits for updates. (I.e. an equivalent of 'Sync Info Message' from [[http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4533#section-3.4|RFC 4533 section 3.4.1]].)[[BR]]
 It seems that there is a workaround for this problem, but it complicates a client application: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/2013-June/015990.html

2. The client application has to dump content of whole LDAP sub-tree to maintain consistency between LDAP and own state (e.g. application-specific database). This dump have to be re-done after any connection failure (and reconnection).

=== RFC 4533 use cases ===
1. More effective bind-dyndb-ldap.

2. (Potentially) A migration path to/from OpenLDAP?

Comment 2 Viktor Ashirov 2014-11-18 22:04:36 UTC
$ rpm -qa | grep 389
389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-9.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-libs-1.3.3.1-9.el7.x86_64

I verified functionality manually while drafting a test plan. 
Test coverage is pending.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 09:31:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0416.html