Bug 1044168 - Schema replication between DS versions may overwrite newer base schema
Summary: Schema replication between DS versions may overwrite newer base schema
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rich Megginson
QA Contact: Viktor Ashirov
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-17 21:37 UTC by Nathan Kinder
Modified: 2020-09-13 20:43 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-1.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 09:32:04 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
pytest10times.out (102.72 KB, text/plain)
2014-11-26 20:15 UTC, Viktor Ashirov
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 827 0 None None None 2020-09-13 20:43:19 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:0416 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: 389-ds-base security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2015-03-05 14:26:33 UTC

Description Nathan Kinder 2013-12-17 21:37:52 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47490

The FreeIPA project has encountered problems with schema replication between DS versions.  Schema replication is very basic, and can end up overwriting base schema from a newer DS with that of the older DS.

For details, see this FreeIPA ticket:

    https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3778

Comment 4 Viktor Ashirov 2014-11-26 20:15:20 UTC
Created attachment 961789 [details]
pytest10times.out

$ rpm -qa | grep 389
389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-9.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.3.3.1-9.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-libs-1.3.3.1-9.el7.x86_64

Test coverage provided by upstream tests (thanks, Thierry!)

I ran tests several times and received inconsistent results. From time to time these tests fail:
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:335: test_ticket47490_two FAILED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:374: test_ticket47490_three FAILED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:440: test_ticket47490_five FAILED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:483: test_ticket47490_six FAILED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:563: test_ticket47490_eight FAILED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:606: test_ticket47490_nine FAILED

Full log with debug info is attached.

I also tried to run tests on a server with high LA (using stress -c 4 on a VM with 1 cpu), and they all passed every time.

Comment 5 thierry bordaz 2014-11-28 18:26:45 UTC
The failures are due to an other fix https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47721

When 47721 is fixed, some test cases in ticket47490_test are broken.
I modified the test cases so that they can test/support 47721 fix. I sent a review for the new test cases

Comment 6 thierry bordaz 2014-12-02 17:14:22 UTC
Viktor,

I just modified the test 47490. It should now take into account the fact the ticket that 47721 is also fixed.

thanks

Comment 7 Viktor Ashirov 2014-12-02 20:59:21 UTC
Hello Thierry, 

thank you for the fix! 

I ran test again, it passed: 
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:342: test_ticket47490_init PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:357: test_ticket47490_one PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:392: test_ticket47490_two PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:435: test_ticket47490_three PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:470: test_ticket47490_four PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:505: test_ticket47490_five PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:554: test_ticket47490_six PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:596: test_ticket47490_seven PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:635: test_ticket47490_eight PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:683: test_ticket47490_nine PASSED
ds/dirsrvtests/tickets/ticket47490_test.py:724: test_ticket47490_final PASSED

Hence marking as VERIFIED.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 09:32:04 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0416.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.