Bug 1045141 - Review Request: python-jsonpath-rw - extended implementation of JSONPath for Python
Summary: Review Request: python-jsonpath-rw - extended implementation of JSONPath for ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Meng
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-19 17:15 UTC by Steve Linabery
Modified: 2014-01-23 11:16 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.fc20
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-22 21:21:30 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
i: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steve Linabery 2013-12-19 17:15:06 UTC
Spec URL: http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw.spec
SRPM URL: http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description: extended implementation of JSONPath for Python
Fedora Account System Username: slinaber

Comment 1 Steve Linabery 2013-12-19 17:16:16 UTC
builds:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6316938

Comment 2 Steve Linabery 2013-12-19 17:49:25 UTC
Please hold on this package review. Upstream just informed me that a new release is available which addresses https://github.com/kennknowles/python-jsonpath-rw/issues/11

I will prepare a new SRPM immediately.

Comment 4 Christopher Meng 2013-12-21 07:16:31 UTC
1. Source0:	https://github.com/kennknowles/python-jsonpath-rw/archive/%version.tar.gz 

->

Source0:	https://github.com/kennknowles/python-jsonpath-rw/archive/%{version}.tar.gz

2. python-devel -> python2-devel
   %{python_sitelib} -> %{python2_sitelib}

3. Remove:

Provides:       python-jsonpath-rw = %{version}-%{release}

4. python3 package is incorrect packaged, see an example of mine:

http://cicku.me/python-pygit2.spec

You can see that currect spec you provide is questionable:

Processing files: python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc21.noarch
Provides: python-jsonpath-rw = 1.2.3-1.fc21
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: python(abi) = 2.7 python(abi) = 3.3
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc21.noarch
warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: buildvm-26.phx2.fedoraproject.org
Wrote: /builddir/build/RPMS/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc21.noarch.rpm

5. Remove rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, we don't need this even on EPEL6.

6. %{python3_sitelib} -> %{python3_sitelib}/*, because this package shouldn't own this directory.

Comment 5 Patrick Laimbock 2013-12-28 12:26:49 UTC
Christopher: about your remark number 5 in #c4:

According to 'rawhide report: 20131228 changes' OpenStack Ceilometer needs python-jsonpath-rw and OpenStack Ceilometer is also built for EL6:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15819

So python-jsonpath-rw is needed for EPEL6.

Comment 6 Christopher Meng 2013-12-31 02:17:58 UTC
OK, please provide me an updated SRPM/SPEC so I can review them again. And don't forget to fix issues.

Comment 7 Christopher Meng 2013-12-31 02:21:37 UTC
(In reply to Patrick Laimbock from comment #5)
> Christopher: about your remark number 5 in #c4:
> 
> According to 'rawhide report: 20131228 changes' OpenStack Ceilometer needs
> python-jsonpath-rw and OpenStack Ceilometer is also built for EL6:
> 
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15819
> 
> So python-jsonpath-rw is needed for EPEL6.

Uh, I forgot to reply to this.

I mean this line: rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, is not needed even on EPEL6; Not this package.

Comment 8 Steve Linabery 2014-01-02 14:43:13 UTC
Apols for excessive holiday lag.

Updated with fixes:
http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw.spec
http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc18.src.rpm

koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6349202

summary (git diff) of changes to spec since last review (hth):
http://slinabery.fedorapeople.org/python-jsonpath-rw.spec.diff

thanks!

Comment 9 Christopher Meng 2014-01-03 12:57:51 UTC
No problem, happy new yarr!


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated




===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
     "Unknown or generated". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck:

Unknown or generated
--------------------
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/__init__.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/jsonpath_rw/parser.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/setup.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/tests/test_jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/tests/test_lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/%{py3dir}/tests/test_parser.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/__init__.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/jsonpath_rw/parser.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/setup.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/tests/test_jsonpath.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/tests/test_lexer.py
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3/tests/test_parser.py

---> Tell upstream.

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
     supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
     in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
     for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
     are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
     in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
     provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
     from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
     -jsonpath-rw
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          python3-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc21.noarch.rpm
          python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc21.src.rpm
python-jsonpath-rw.src:11: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 8)
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
# rpmlint python3-jsonpath-rw python-jsonpath-rw
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
# echo 'rpmlint-done:'



Requires
--------
python3-jsonpath-rw (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python3-decorator
    python3-ply
    python3-six

python-jsonpath-rw (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    python(abi)
    python-decorator
    python-ply
    python-six



Provides
--------
python3-jsonpath-rw:
    python3-jsonpath-rw

python-jsonpath-rw:
    python-jsonpath-rw



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/kennknowles/python-jsonpath-rw/archive/1.2.3.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 044e5069631c159eea142d89da6e1e0e41adc1527741ff573677c20c4f67caef
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 044e5069631c159eea142d89da6e1e0e41adc1527741ff573677c20c4f67caef


Generated by fedora-review 0.5.1 (bb9bf27) last change: 2013-12-13
Command line :/bin/fedora-review -rvn python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-1.fc18.src.rpm
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-i386
Active plugins: Generic, Python, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby
Disabled flags: BATCH, EPEL5, EXARCH, DISTTAG
----------------
Nice work!

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 10 Steve Linabery 2014-01-03 16:46:03 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: python-jsonpath-rw
Short Description: Extended implementation of JSONPath
Owners: slinabery
Branches: f19 f20 el6
InitialCC:

Comment 11 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-01-03 19:33:10 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2014-01-06 15:19:56 UTC
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.fc20

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2014-01-06 15:24:03 UTC
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.el6

Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2014-01-07 01:23:36 UTC
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2014-01-22 21:21:30 UTC
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.

Comment 16 Fedora Update System 2014-01-23 11:09:02 UTC
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

Comment 17 Fedora Update System 2014-01-23 11:16:10 UTC
python-jsonpath-rw-1.2.3-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.