Description of problem: Closing caja Version-Release number of selected component: mate-file-manager-1.6.3-1.fc20 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.1.10 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja -n crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 magazine_chain_pop_head at gslice.c:550 #1 magazine_chain_prepare_fields at gslice.c:624 #2 magazine_cache_push_magazine at gslice.c:697 #3 thread_memory_magazine2_unload at gslice.c:815 #4 g_slice_free1 at gslice.c:1106 #5 g_type_free_instance at gtype.c:1938 #6 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1073 #11 gtk_object_dispose at gtkobject.c:421 #13 gtk_box_forall at gtkbox.c:1251 #14 gtk_container_destroy at gtkcontainer.c:1073
Created attachment 842518 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 842519 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 842520 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 842521 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 842522 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 842523 [details] File: exploitable
Created attachment 842524 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 842525 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 842526 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 842527 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 842528 [details] File: var_log_messages
Can you describe a little more detailed what happend? Did this issue occurs frequently ?
I renamed a folder added a .1 to it the folder was more than the standard 8 + 3 name. it was like ablitron.me.you reneame ablitron.me.you.1 Yes it has accorded quick frequently.
I forward the issue to upstream, pls ask there for help. https://github.com/mate-desktop/caja/issues/224
Another user experienced a similar problem: Copying a 1.1 GB file to memstick with windows FS (probably NTFS) when unmounting after all was complete CAJA error came up. reporter: libreport-2.1.10 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja -n crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64 package: mate-file-manager-1.6.3-1.fc20 reason: caja killed by SIGSEGV runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000
Just so you guys know. It was to my link station with is running XFS. locally I have not had any issues it all is network file copys to the link station. gvfs is junk on fedora 19, please do not take any offence to this. It was hanging on a lot of files. yes they were 1 to 2 gigs big. It also did it on small files too. I installed ubuntu 12.04 lts and it worked perfectly but I missed my fedora so I upgraded to fedora 20. Fedora 20 gvfs is a lot better but it still is crahing the file browser. Please note I know Fedora 19 is almost end of life but gvfs is hosted / broken badly on it.
Another user experienced a similar problem: I just simply close the mate file manager "caja" reporter: libreport-2.1.11 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja -n crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64 package: mate-file-manager-1.6.3-1.fc20 reason: caja killed by SIGSEGV runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000
Glad to see the back trace worked. For some reason it is failing now and I can not submit any more bug reports also.
Another user experienced a similar problem: I had just finished copying a couple of files to a flash drive and proceeded to eject the device. I guess the transfer from the cache to the drive was not done yet, hence the error. I did not notice any other problems with caja right before or after that. reporter: libreport-2.1.12 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja -n crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.13.5-200.fc20.i686 package: mate-file-manager-1.6.3-2.fc20 reason: caja killed by SIGSEGV runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000
Another user experienced a similar problem: 1) Clicked on an sftp network connection that was not yet mounted 2) Got a message "impossible to verify host identity" 3) Clicked on "Discard" 4) Got "impossible to show..." ecc 5) Crash reporter: libreport-2.2.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64 package: mate-file-manager-1.6.4-4.fc20 reason: caja killed by SIGSEGV runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000
Another user experienced a similar problem: I closed a caja file manager windows reporter: libreport-2.2.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.14.5-200.fc20.x86_64 package: mate-file-manager-1.6.4-4.fc20 reason: caja killed by SIGSEGV runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000
Another user experienced a similar problem: I added a luks encrypted filesystem which appeared in the "Deices" section where i could mount/umount it using passphrase etc. At some point the encrypted device disappeared from the "Devices" section, so I closed the Caja window and openned a new one. Then this error happened but a Caja window opened anyway, the encrypted partition still not showing in the "Devices" section. reporter: libreport-2.2.2 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: caja crash_function: magazine_chain_pop_head executable: /usr/bin/caja kernel: 3.14.8-200.fc20.x86_64 package: mate-file-manager-1.6.4-4.fc20 reason: caja killed by SIGSEGV runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000
I just closed a caja window with previewed photos and I got this bug paired with bug 1046721
I've got another pair to this bug, the bug 1104178
Yeah, I use Fedora 20, a well known distro that doesn't have any proprietary software on their repositories, they have some alternatives for us like open source plugins to reproduce SWF files, so you can watch some videos on YouTube, but to be honest they all suck, I mean, these plugins were made when YouTube didn't have that amazing HTML5 support that have today. Last night I decided to install Adobe Flash, it works Alright, but, has been like 2 years (?) since Adobe said that they will not bring any update (just "major security" updates) so it's kinda fucked up, I have a non free plugin, with no security updates, and many people too, so people in linux already is trying to avoid Adobe because of that. Pretty bad for open source community seems that Adobe is keeping like the 70% of the internet and like the 97% of porn. If I can help, I can test the web on any distribution except on BSD, I tested it last year on my PS3 and it goes pretty awesome.
closed, package are renamed to caja