Version-Release number of selected component: easytag-2.1.7-4.fc20 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.1.10 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: easytag crash_function: node_get_pos executable: /usr/bin/easytag kernel: 3.12.5-302.fc20.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #0 node_get_pos at gsequence.c:1673 #1 g_sequence_iter_get_position at gsequence.c:1414 #2 gtk_list_store_get_path at gtkliststore.c:461 #3 gtk_tree_selection_select_iter at gtktreeselection.c:822 #4 Browser_List_Select_File_By_DLM at browser.c:1690 #5 Cddb_Track_List_Row_Selected at cddb.c:1372 #6 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:840 #12 gtk_real_button_released at gtkbutton.c:1712 #13 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:840 #16 gtk_button_button_release at gtkbutton.c:1604
Created attachment 843086 [details] File: backtrace
Created attachment 843087 [details] File: cgroup
Created attachment 843088 [details] File: core_backtrace
Created attachment 843089 [details] File: dso_list
Created attachment 843090 [details] File: environ
Created attachment 843091 [details] File: exploitable
Created attachment 843092 [details] File: limits
Created attachment 843093 [details] File: maps
Created attachment 843094 [details] File: open_fds
Created attachment 843095 [details] File: proc_pid_status
Created attachment 843096 [details] File: var_log_messages
Hi, now that easytag-2.1.9-1 is in F20, and I cannot seen to reproduce this crash with that version. Can you test the latest version and attach a new stacktrace and steps to reproduce the crash if you still have the problem? Thanks!
The information we've requested above is required in order to review this problem report further and diagnose or fix the issue if it is still present. Since it has been thirty days or more since we first requested additional information, we're assuming the problem is either no longer present in the current Fedora release, or that there is no longer any interest in tracking the problem. Setting status to "CLOSED: INSUFFICIENT_DATA". If you still experience this problem after updating to our latest Fedora release and can provide the information previously requested, please feel free to reopen the bug report.