Bug 1047362 - Rawhide version of asciidoctor is older than f20 version
Summary: Rawhide version of asciidoctor is older than f20 version
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-asciidoctor
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vít Ondruch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-12-30 16:44 UTC by Ken Dreyer
Modified: 2023-09-14 01:56 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-asciidoctor-0.1.4-1.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-04-14 12:05:11 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ken Dreyer 2013-12-30 16:44:54 UTC 
0.1.4 is built and pushed to F19 and F20, but it is not in Rawhide. Please build 0.1.4 for Rawhide.

See https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005 for information regarding why builds are no longer inherited "up" into Rawhide any more.

This affects the (future) packaging for rubygem-github-makeup in Rawhide. See https://github.com/github/markup/pull/235
Comment 1 Ken Dreyer 2013-12-30 16:45:58 UTC 
er, meant to say "rubygem-github-markup" instead of "makeup" in comment #1 :)
Comment 2 Ken Dreyer 2014-02-07 03:38:06 UTC 
Hi Dan, would you mind building 0.1.4 for Rawhide?
Comment 3 Ken Dreyer 2014-02-13 00:04:50 UTC 
Hi Dan, I've applied for ACLs in pkgdb so I can update the package in Rawhide.
Comment 4 Ken Dreyer 2014-04-08 15:08:25 UTC 
I've emailed Dan a couple times. He wants to approve my pkgdb request, but he reports that he doesn't currently have access to his FAS account.
Comment 5 Ken Dreyer 2014-04-09 23:32:47 UTC 
Vít was kind enough to kick off a 0.1.4 build earlier this week: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=509850

Unfortunately that failed because the test suite is not compatible with Minitest 5 that went into Rawhide recently. I've posted a patch upstream for Minitest 5, at https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor/pull/937, and backported that patch to 0.1.4 for Fedora.

  * Tue Apr 08 2014 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> - 0.1.4-2
  - Patch to support Minitest 5

Exact changes in Git: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-asciidoctor.git/ (This can just be fetched and pushed into Fedora's official dist-git.)

Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-asciidoctor.spec
SRPM URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-asciidoctor-0.1.4-2.fc21.src.rpm

F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6722221
Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2014-04-14 12:05:11 UTC 
Hi Ken,

Since I am not convinced, that upstream is likely to accept your patch, I decided to build asciidoctor in its current state with "BR: rubygem(minitest) < 5". Lets see how it evolves.
Comment 7 Ken Dreyer 2014-05-08 17:38:30 UTC 
By the way, upstream did accept the minitest patch, so when the final release of asciidoctor v1.5.0 comes out, we can drop the "< 5" requirement on "BR: rubygem(minitest)".
Comment 8 Vít Ondruch 2014-05-09 07:35:59 UTC 
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #7)
> By the way, upstream did accept the minitest patch, so when the final
> release of asciidoctor v1.5.0 comes out, we can drop the "< 5" requirement
> on "BR: rubygem(minitest)".

Congrats! Sorry for being pessimistic ;)
Comment 9 Ken Dreyer 2014-05-09 15:53:54 UTC 
No prob :) "Staying close to upstream" is why I like Fedora.
Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 01:56:11 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.