Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: 1. The routine rpcsvc_drc_init() is only used while initialization of NFS xlator. It should just check for nfs.drc option and init DRC feature accordingly. If it's set to OFF, then rpcsvc_drc_init() allocates memory for svc.drc and set ret value to 0 and goes to out: block where drc is leaked. 2. rpcsvc_drc_init() should just allocate svc.drc and init it. Here svc.drc can never be valid. 3. If svc.drc gets init'd here, no point of checking for drc type here.
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6628 (gNFS: Small memory leak in rpcsvc_drc_init()) posted (#1) for review on master by Santosh Pradhan (spradhan)
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/6628 (gNFS: Small memory leak in rpcsvc_drc_init()) posted (#2) for review on master by Santosh Pradhan (spradhan)
COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/6628 committed in master by Vijay Bellur (vbellur) ------ commit 825b976ee30a53e89fe747b4a3ba8f2eb862047c Author: Santosh Kumar Pradhan <spradhan> Date: Thu Jan 2 20:55:59 2014 +0530 gNFS: Small memory leak in rpcsvc_drc_init() 1. The routine rpcsvc_drc_init() is only used while initialization of NFS xlator. It should just check for nfs.drc option and init DRC feature accordingly. If it's set to OFF, then rpcsvc_drc_init() allocates memory for svc.drc and set ret value to 0 and goes to out: block where drc is leaked. 2. rpcsvc_drc_init() should just allocate svc.drc and init it. Here svc.drc can never be valid. 3. If svc.drc gets init'd here, no point of checking for drc type here. Change-Id: I4085771cdb8c9c15d1b9c548b77929a37f27c124 BUG: 1047902 Signed-off-by: Santosh Kumar Pradhan <spradhan> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/6628 Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> Reviewed-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur>
A beta release for GlusterFS 3.6.0 has been released. Please verify if the release solves this bug report for you. In case the glusterfs-3.6.0beta1 release does not have a resolution for this issue, leave a comment in this bug and move the status to ASSIGNED. If this release fixes the problem for you, leave a note and change the status to VERIFIED. Packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update (possibly an "updates-testing" repository) infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-September/018836.html [2] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/
This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.6.1, please reopen this bug report. glusterfs-3.6.1 has been announced [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2014-November/019410.html [2] http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users