Bug 1048426 - [RHSC][Scale] - Column names of rebalance status dialog gets scrolled up.
Summary: [RHSC][Scale] - Column names of rebalance status dialog gets scrolled up.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: rhsc
Version: 2.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Ramesh N
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1035040
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-04 07:05 UTC by RamaKasturi
Modified: 2015-12-03 17:19 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
When there are more entries in Rebalance Status and Remove Brick Status window, the column names scrolls up along with the entries while scrolling the window. Workaround: Scroll up the Rebalance Status and Remove Brick Status window to view the column names.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-12-03 17:19:36 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description RamaKasturi 2014-01-04 07:05:21 UTC 
Description of problem:
In the rebalance status dialog, column names of the table goes up, while scrolling.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhsc-2.1.2-0.28.beta.el6_5.noarch

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Have the scale config with 16 servers
2. Create a distribute volume and start rebalance on it.
3. Now click on the status button from the rebalance drop down icon.
4. Once the dialog is opened, scroll the bar.

Actual results:
while scrolling the bar, column names also gets scrolled up.

Expected results:
Column names should not get scrolled up.

Additional info:
Comment 2 RamaKasturi 2014-01-07 13:21:41 UTC 
seen the above issue with CB14 (rhsc-2.1.2-0.32.el6rhs.noarch) and glusterfs version (glusterfs-server-3.4.0.54rhs-2.el6rhs.x86_64) as well.
Comment 3 RamaKasturi 2014-01-08 06:06:50 UTC 
Scale configuration details are below:

Create a volume with 16 servers, 1 brick per server.
Comment 4 Shalaka 2014-01-29 05:51:57 UTC 
Please review the edited Doc Text and signoff.
Comment 5 Ramesh N 2014-01-29 07:19:21 UTC 
Doc test looks good to me.
Comment 6 Dusmant 2014-04-01 05:20:25 UTC 
Triaged and not taken in Denali
Comment 7 Sahina Bose 2015-01-23 12:00:23 UTC 
Removing FutureFeature keyword as this not an RFE
Comment 8 Vivek Agarwal 2015-12-03 17:19:36 UTC 
Thank you for submitting this issue for consideration in Red Hat Gluster Storage. The release for which you requested us to review, is now End of Life. Please See https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/rhs/

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Red Hat Gluster Storage, please feel free to file a new report against the current release.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.