Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1048827

Summary:	Split ruby200 scl into ruby200 and ror40 scls
Product:	Red Hat Software Collections	Reporter:	Josef Stribny <jstribny>
Component:	ruby	Assignee:	Vít Ondruch <vondruch>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Iveta Wiedermann <isenfeld>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	ruby200	CC:	hhorak, isenfeld, mhradile
Target Milestone:	beta
Target Release:	1.1
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1058742 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-06-04 07:14:22 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1039934, 1056022, 1058742

Description Josef Stribny 2014-01-06 12:01:59 UTC

Description of problem:

ruby200 contains both ruby and ruby on rails (ror) packages. It's better to split them so we can easily make/maintain/combine different versions of ruby and rails.


Actual results:

One ruby200 scl.


Expected results:

Having both ruby200 scl including ruby and ror40 including rails packages (the rest of the packages from current ruby200).


Additional info:

Packages from ror40 will depend on ruby from ruby200 scl.

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2014-01-06 12:14:09 UTC

Just one sidenote. We have to document that ror40 collection works just with ruby200 collection, although I am pretty sure we will receive complains "ror40 does now work with ruby193 collection, how is that" no matter how hard we will be documenting ;)

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2014-06-04 07:14:22 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2014-0604.html