Bug 1048958 - [RFE] misc packaging fixes
Summary: [RFE] misc packaging fixes
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-rugged
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Troy Dawson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-06 15:49 UTC by Ken Dreyer
Modified: 2014-02-05 04:06 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-06 18:07:48 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Avoid assuming that everyone has a GitHub account and SSH key for GitHub. (927 bytes, patch)
2014-01-06 15:49 UTC, Ken Dreyer
no flags Details | Diff
remove trailing whitespace (725 bytes, patch)
2014-01-06 15:50 UTC, Ken Dreyer
no flags Details | Diff
add %configure args for post-0.19.0 (792 bytes, patch)
2014-01-06 15:50 UTC, Ken Dreyer
no flags Details | Diff

Description Ken Dreyer 2014-01-06 15:49:34 UTC
Created attachment 846150 [details]
Avoid assuming that everyone has a GitHub account and SSH key for GitHub.

Thanks for maintaining rugged in Fedora! Here's a couple patches for the package.

Comment 1 Ken Dreyer 2014-01-06 15:50:11 UTC
Created attachment 846151 [details]
remove trailing whitespace

Comment 2 Ken Dreyer 2014-01-06 15:50:36 UTC
Created attachment 846152 [details]
add %configure args for post-0.19.0

Comment 3 Troy Dawson 2014-01-06 18:07:48 UTC
Hi Ken,
Thanks for these.
I have put these, along with a change from using a patch to fix the gemspec, to using sed, into the rpm.
I am going to mark this as done, even though I'm only pushing it out to rawhide.  Since it is only a spec file change, I don't see a reason to push a built rpm, out to all the releases.

Comment 4 Ken Dreyer 2014-01-06 19:23:52 UTC
Thanks for the quick response. I think you can also drop zlib-devel, as well as the ruby(abi) bits.

Comment 5 Ken Dreyer 2014-02-05 04:06:06 UTC
(In reply to Ken Dreyer from comment #4)
> Thanks for the quick response. I think you can also drop zlib-devel, as well
> as the ruby(abi) bits.

I've filed this as #1061552


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.