RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1049030 - Windows Sync group issues
Summary: Windows Sync group issues
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rich Megginson
QA Contact: Viktor Ashirov
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1049029
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-01-06 20:05 UTC by Noriko Hosoi
Modified: 2020-09-13 20:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-1.el7
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1049029
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-03-05 09:33:22 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 979 0 None None None 2020-09-13 20:53:36 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:0416 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: 389-ds-base security, bug fix, and enhancement update 2015-03-05 14:26:33 UTC

Description Noriko Hosoi 2014-01-06 20:05:10 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1049029 +++

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47642

version: 389-Directory/1.2.11.25 B2013.347.1221

389DS <--> Windows 2008 R2

Name of group: GSG_TESTE

Included a lot of users on this group, including this user:

choose a user to test
DN of the user on windows: CN=Alberto Viana,OU=TESTE,DC=homolog,DC=rnp
DN  of the user on 389DS: uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp

What I did:

Changeg the OU of the user via windows to:
NEW DN: CN=Alberto Viana,OU=NEW,DC=homolog,DC=rnp


What happenned:
Did not deleted all users from the group.
389DS moved correctly the user to new DN: uid=alberto.viana,ou=NEW,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
389DS Added this new uid (uid=alberto.viana,ou=NEW,dc=homolog,dc=rnp) to group, but keep the old entry too (uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp).

Whe I remove the old entry manually (uid=alberto.viana,ou=TESTE,dc=homolog,dc=rnp) from the group, 389 DS deletes all users from the group on both sides (389DS and windows)

Just to let you know that I have others versions of 389DS running (389-Directory/1.3.1.3 and 389-Directory/1.2.10.12), and just the fact to change the DN/OU of one user in a group, deletes all users from this group (not from 389 DS).
Comment 2 Viktor Ashirov 2015-01-17 22:19:29 UTC 
$ rpm -qa | grep 389
389-ds-base-debuginfo-1.3.3.1-11.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-libs-1.3.3.1-11.el7.x86_64
389-ds-base-1.3.3.1-11.el7.x86_64

[0] Add test entries:
$ ldapmodify -D "cn=Administrator,cn=users,dc=adrelm,dc=com" -w Secret123  -H ldap://win2k8.adrelm.com -a << EOF
dn: OU=subou,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: subou

dn: CN=usr0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: user
cn: usr0
sn: usr0
uid: usr0
sAMAccountName: usr0
distinguishedName: CN=usr0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com

dn: CN=grp0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: Group
cn: grp0
distinguishedName: CN=grp0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com 
name: grp0
sAMAccountName: grp0
member: CN=usr0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com
EOF
adding new entry "OU=subou,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com"

adding new entry "CN=usr0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com"

adding new entry "CN=grp0,ou=adsync,dc=adrelm,dc=com"


$ ldapmodify -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123  -H ldap://localhost:1189 -a << EOF
dn: ou=subou,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
objectClass: top
objectClass: organizationalUnit
ou: subou
EOF
adding new entry "ou=subou,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com"

[1] Move usr0 to ou=subou: 
$ ldapmodify  -D "cn=Administrator,cn=users,dc=adrelm,dc=com" -w Secret123  -H ldap://win2k8.adrelm.com  << EOF
dn: CN=usr0,OU=adsync,DC=adrelm,DC=com
changetype: moddn
newrdn: CN=usr0
deleteoldrdn: 1
newsuperior: OU=subou,OU=adsync,DC=adrelm,DC=com
EOF
modifying rdn of entry "CN=usr0,OU=adsync,DC=adrelm,DC=com"

[2] Check uniqueMember in the group: 
$ ldapsearch -o ldif-wrap=no -LLL -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 -H ldap://localhost:1189 -b dc=example,dc=com cn=grp0 uniqueMember
dn: cn=grp0,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com
uniqueMember: uid=usr0,ou=subou,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com

DN of the uniquemember is adjusted to the new location, marking as VERIFIED.
Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2015-03-05 09:33:22 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0416.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.