Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1049635

Summary: RHOS 4.0 installation and configuration guide lists forman as technology preview
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Colin Devine <cdevine>
Component: doc-Installation_and_Configuration_GuideAssignee: Scott Radvan <sradvan>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: ecs-bugs
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.0CC: apevec, rlandman, yeylon
Target Milestone: z1Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: 4.0   
Hardware: All   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Build Name: 15807, Installation and Configuration Guide-4 Build Date: 18-12-2013 17:08:39 Topic ID: 19227-566040 [Latest]
Last Closed: 2014-01-23 23:46:38 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1049118    

Description Colin Devine 2014-01-07 22:03:51 UTC 
Title: Running the Installer

Describe the issue:

The Red Hat OpenStack 4.0 Installation and Configuration Guide section 3.5 contains a section that indicates that Forman is Technology Preview.



A message is displayed indicating that the functionality being deployed is provided as a Technology Preview: 

#################### RED HAT OPENSTACK #####################
Thank you for using the Red Hat OpenStack Foreman Installer!
Please note that this tool is a Technology Preview
For more information about Red hat Technology Previews, see
https://access.redhat.com/support/offerings/techpreview/
############################################################
Press [Enter] to continue



Suggestions for improvement:

Forman is not technology preview, so that section needs to be removed.


Additional information:
Comment 3 Scott Radvan 2014-01-20 06:16:24 UTC 
*** Bug 1045644 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***