Bug 105045 - Authentication Server field should be optional, not mandatory for Domain and ADS security
Summary: Authentication Server field should be optional, not mandatory for Domain and ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: redhat-config-samba
Version: beta1
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Brent Fox
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 151129
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-09-24 21:23 UTC by George Karabin
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:57 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-15 23:45:29 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description George Karabin 2003-09-24 21:23:34 UTC
Description of problem:

When using Domain and ADS security, the "Preferences->Server
Settings->Security->Authentication Server" field must have a non-NULL value or
the tool doesn't let the user commit the settings, and brings up a dialog with
the text: "You must specify a password server when using 'ads', 'domain' or
'server' authentication."

This isn't strictly true, and is confusing to samba neophytes or infrequent
users (like myself). smb.conf permits a value of "*" to be entered to permit the
password server to be auto-located. The Windows clients that I've seen at the
companies I've worked at are configured to use auto-location (I don't even know
if it can be overridden). Presumably a nice benefit of this approach is that it
gives admins an option to change the server IP without needing to maintain the
clients.

At a minimum, the text of the dialog should be modified to indicate that "*" is
a permissible value for auto-location, since many users may not be familiar with
this detail of smb.conf's format.

A better solution (I think) would instead let the user select either
auto-location or manual setting with a ui control, and only permit the server
name to be entered if manual were chosen.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

3.0.0-5rc1

Comment 1 Brent Fox 2003-10-15 23:45:29 UTC
I've clarified the error message.  Should be fixed in redhat-config-samba-1.1.4-1.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.